2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2018.8508298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localizing and Quantifying Damage in Social Media Images

Abstract: Traditional post-disaster assessment of damage heavily relies on expensive GIS data, especially remote sensing image data. In recent years, social media has become a rich source of disaster information that may be useful in assessing damage at a lower cost. Such information includes text (e.g., tweets) or images posted by eyewitnesses of a disaster. Most of the existing research explores the use of text in identifying situational awareness information useful for disaster response teams. The use of social media… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alam et al [35] proposed an image-processing system called Image4Act, which was based on the visual geometry group-16 (VGG-16) model, and sought to support relief efforts by collecting, removing noise from, and classifying images posted on social media. Li et al [36] proposed a method to create a damage detection map based on the VGG-19 model and to measure its severity for images collected from social media. Weber et al [16] trained the Resnet-18 model to classify images collected from social media into 43 types of incidents using a significant number of class-positive and class-negative datasets, and it could automatically detect incidents from images collected from social media.…”
Section: Critical Image Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alam et al [35] proposed an image-processing system called Image4Act, which was based on the visual geometry group-16 (VGG-16) model, and sought to support relief efforts by collecting, removing noise from, and classifying images posted on social media. Li et al [36] proposed a method to create a damage detection map based on the VGG-19 model and to measure its severity for images collected from social media. Weber et al [16] trained the Resnet-18 model to classify images collected from social media into 43 types of incidents using a significant number of class-positive and class-negative datasets, and it could automatically detect incidents from images collected from social media.…”
Section: Critical Image Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Nguyen et al investigated a more generic solution to classify disaster images according to damage severity using convolutional neural networks [69]. Similarly, Li et al proposed a method based on class activation mapping to localize and quantify damage in social media images posted during disasters [57]. Taking a step further, Li et al explored domain adaptation approach to identify disaster damage images during an emergent event when there is scarcity of labeled data [56].…”
Section: Detection Of Images Showing Damaged Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large set of social sensing applications are sensitive to delay, i.e., have real-time requirements. Examples of such applications include intelligent transportation systems [48], environmental sensing [46], and disaster and emergency response [16]. Traditional social sensing applications push all the computation tasks to the remote servers/cloud, which can be quite ineffective, particularly for delay-sensitive applications, when the network bandwidth is limited and the communication latency is high [47,49].…”
Section: Related Work 21 Social Sensing and Edge Computingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tasks for DDA: i) edge devices equipped with cameras (e.g., dash cameras, UAVs) are tasked to capture live images of locations of interest; ii) extracting Damage Detection Map (DDM) features using Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model from raw images; iii) assess damage severity from DDM using the algorithm in [16].…”
Section: Case Study 1: Disaster Damage Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%