The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2010
DOI: 10.1785/0120090175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized Surface Disruptions Observed by InSAR during Strong Earthquakes in Java and Hawai'i

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sensor, after the August-September 2010 eruption events. Such a large deformation could be due to a combined effects of depressurization of the shallow magma reservoir due to cooling, and thermo-elastic contraction and poro-elastic settling of eruptive deposits (e.g., Lu et al, 2005;Wadge et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2008;Poland, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sensor, after the August-September 2010 eruption events. Such a large deformation could be due to a combined effects of depressurization of the shallow magma reservoir due to cooling, and thermo-elastic contraction and poro-elastic settling of eruptive deposits (e.g., Lu et al, 2005;Wadge et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2008;Poland, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interferograms have also been instrumental in identifying areas prone to collapse, for example, along the rim of the summit eruptive vent that opened in 2008 (Richter et al, 2013) and on supposedly stable land near the lava-ocean entry (Poland and Orr, 2014). InSAR has even been important for detecting subtle features associated with earthquakes, from small (∼M 3) shallow seismic events in the Koa'e Fault System between Kīlauea's summit caldera and the coast (Swanson et al, 2018) (Figure 5), to isolated areas of subsidence on the western side of the island (mostly in Mauna Loa lava flows) that were associated with a magnitude M 6.7 earthquake in 2006 and are thought to be a result of surface settling due to strong shaking (Poland, 2010).…”
Section: Geodetic Imaging Of Magma Storage and Transport Systems At Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration in buildings from zero to several meters per second will cause structures, especially with high masses, likely to retain their positions so that building strength is crucial. For example, an earthquake acceleration of 3-5 m/sec 2 (± 0.5g) in the Yogyakarta earthquake of 27 May 2006 (Poland, 2010) can destroy non-technical buildings quickly. Due to the sediment soil conditions that are soft, the acceleration is even doubled in the area near the source of the earthquake (Walter et al, 2008) or 0.20 ~ 0.34g in the horizontal direction up to 3.5g in the vertical direction (Amr S Elnashai, Kim, Yun, & Sidarta, 2007), so the impact is that almost none of the buildings survives in the area.…”
Section: Accelerationmentioning
confidence: 99%