1980
DOI: 10.1016/0025-5416(80)90222-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized stress relaxation by impression testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by the uniaxial relationship above, when a flat punch (cylindrical) indenter is employed in the indentation stress relaxation test, we define an effective indentation strain rate as the ratio between the indentation plastic displacement rate and the characteristic depth of the plastic zone (which is comparable to the punch diameter, D [19,20]), that is, εind = ẋind p /D = −ẋ ind e /D, where the indentation elastic displacement rate ẋind e can be calculated as ẋind e = Ḟ ind /S ind with F ind the applied indentation force and S ind the contact stiffness. Similarly, we define an effective applied indentation stress as σ ind = F ind /A, where A is the cross-section area of the flat punch indenter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by the uniaxial relationship above, when a flat punch (cylindrical) indenter is employed in the indentation stress relaxation test, we define an effective indentation strain rate as the ratio between the indentation plastic displacement rate and the characteristic depth of the plastic zone (which is comparable to the punch diameter, D [19,20]), that is, εind = ẋind p /D = −ẋ ind e /D, where the indentation elastic displacement rate ẋind e can be calculated as ẋind e = Ḟ ind /S ind with F ind the applied indentation force and S ind the contact stiffness. Similarly, we define an effective applied indentation stress as σ ind = F ind /A, where A is the cross-section area of the flat punch indenter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time dependent penetration depth is recorded, from which the impression velocity is calculated. Previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] have demonstrated that the impression creep test gives similar stress and temperature dependences of the creep behaviour to the conventional creep tests. The advantage of using the impression creep is that multiple impression tests can be made on one sample of small size, which reduces the microstructural variation and offers a simple and inexpensive way for the preparation of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The stress relaxation behavior of materials leading to a steady state condition has been observed in other materials. [19][20][21] Thus, in composites with 4 % of volume fractions SiC (nano) produced by mechanical alloying, compacting with a compression force of 620 MPa, and sintering at 873 K, the primary stress relaxation rate decreases due to the creation of immobilized dislocations (pinning at the nano-reinforcement). Correspondingly, the existence of voids (depending on the indenter size) in the form of drops, or more relaxation, are observable in graphs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%