2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117588
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized mixing of anaerobic plug flow reactors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Plug-flow reactors (PFRs) have been applied as reliable AD reactors for dry AD for some time [5]. Higher stability, high removal rates, and low acid contents make them an attractive alternative to a conventional stirred tank reactor [6]. Lately, their characteristic to form gradients along the reactor due to a laminar flow field has got into focus: It has been shown that phase separation into acidogenesis and methanogenesis inside a PFR allows higher substrate flexibility, higher resistance against a low pH value [7], and higher loading rates compared to traditional stirred tanks [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plug-flow reactors (PFRs) have been applied as reliable AD reactors for dry AD for some time [5]. Higher stability, high removal rates, and low acid contents make them an attractive alternative to a conventional stirred tank reactor [6]. Lately, their characteristic to form gradients along the reactor due to a laminar flow field has got into focus: It has been shown that phase separation into acidogenesis and methanogenesis inside a PFR allows higher substrate flexibility, higher resistance against a low pH value [7], and higher loading rates compared to traditional stirred tanks [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, their characteristic to form gradients along the reactor due to a laminar flow field has got into focus: It has been shown that phase separation into acidogenesis and methanogenesis inside a PFR allows higher substrate flexibility, higher resistance against a low pH value [7], and higher loading rates compared to traditional stirred tanks [8]. The development of certain distinguished process phases inside a PFR has been explored for efficient biogas production of maize silage [8], pineapple peel and pulp [9], food waste with municipal waste water [6], and cattle manure [7], among others. Enrichment of different microbial subpopulations with hydrolytic bacteria in the front and methanogenic bacteria in the late part of a PFR has been shown by Dong et al [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of distinct process phases, in particular an acidogenic and methanogenic phase in PFRs, has been observed with various feedstock before (Sans et al 1995 ; Namsree et al 2012 ; Dong et al 2019 ; Veluchamy et al 2019 ; Khalil et al 2021 ). However, the application of a PFR as separate hydrolysis stage under the formation of a distinct hydrolytic and acidogenic phase has not been investigated thoroughly yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The operation in a PFR, instead of the frequently applied stirred tank reactors, has several characteristic features: i) gradient formation in the reactor allows the establishment of microenvironments for specialized microbes [19,20], ii) operation at a high total solids content [21], iii) low energy input for stirring [14,22]. We hypothesize that by using a PFR with thin-sludge recirculation, e cient hydrolysis of recalcitrant feedstock is feasible without further pretreatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%