Localized hepatocarcinogenesis: the response of the liver and kidney to implanted carcinogens

Abstract

Attempts by early workers to induce liver tumours by the local implantation of carcinogens had by and large not been successful, so that the liver came to be viewed as being "resistant" to tumourigenesis by this means. A review of these early studies showed not only that fibrosarcomas could be easily induced by the local application of 3-methylcholanthrene (3-M.C.), but that there were also reasons why the apparently low susceptibility of the liver to the localised induction of hepatocellular tumours should not be accepted as established dogma. In an attempt to re-investigate this problem pellets made of cholesterol (CHOL), anthracene (ANT), alpha-naphthylisothiocyanate (ANIT), 3-M.C. or 4-dimethylaminoazobenzene (DAB) were implanted into the livers of male litter-mate weanling rats. The evolution of the response was studied by histological examination of the implantation site at varying intervals. In each instance the liver responded with the formation of a firm, complete connective tissue capsule which, however, did not prevent the gradual degradation of the implants. No tumours or other significant changes were observed with the control implants of CHOL or ANT. ANIT, known to damage biliary ducts, elicited what appeared to be an intense serous exudation which was separated from the adjacent parenchyma by a shell-like deposition of calcium in the connective tissue capsule. No significant biliary changes were observed, however, and no tumours were produced. Attention should be drawn to this reproducible, regularly occurring, in vivo model of extra-osseous calcification. The 3-M.C. induced a high incidence of large solitary bosselated tumours associated with the carcinogenic pellet which was found embedded in the tumour mass. The architectural arrangement and bizarre cytological appearance of the tumours led to the currently widely used diagnosis of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (M.F.H.) rather than the fibrosarcoma or rhabdomyosarcoma of the early workers. Some tumours produced large numbers of implantation metastases in the peritoneal cavity, but no distant metastases were observed in this series. Of particular interest is the fact that it was not possible to determine the site of origin of these tumours despite histological sampling at intervals of the site of implantation of the pellets. In contrast to these pleomorphic, clearly mesenchymal tumours reliably produced by 3-M.C., the implantation of pellets of DAB produced fewer tumours which were classified as large, singly occurring hepatocellular carcinomas (H.C.C.).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animal Models of Liver Cancer

“…Other popular rat models of HCC involve chemical treatment to induce carcinogenesis (Lim 2002). Implantation of carcinogens rather than dietary administration has met with very limited success (Aterman 1987). While methods are available for cannulating the hepatic artery of a rat for chemoembolization for example (Li et al 2002), these are not commonplace and the percutaneous ablation methods are only minimally improved by going from the mouse to rat.…”

Stem Cell Origins and Animal Models of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

“…Other popular rat models of HCC involve chemical treatment to induce carcinogenesis [77]. Implantation of carcinogens rather than dietary administration has met with very limited success [78]. While methods are available for cannulating the hepatic artery of a rat for chemoembolization, for example [79], these are not commonplace, and the percutaneous ablation methods are only minimally improved by going from the mouse to rat.…”