1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.49.10248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized exciton magnetic polarons inCd1xMn

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

11
91
1
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
11
91
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate the polaron binding energy we use a simple thermodynamic model, where the emission linewidth, w, should vary as w= (2ε p k B T) 1/2 [30], where ε p is the polaron binding energy, T is the temperature and k B is the Boltzman constant. Using this model for typical emission lines of width 5meV at T=5K, the polaron binding energy is equal to ~ 30meV, which is significantly larger than binding energies of EMPs observed typically for bulk CdMnTe [19] and CdMnTe QWs [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to estimate the polaron binding energy we use a simple thermodynamic model, where the emission linewidth, w, should vary as w= (2ε p k B T) 1/2 [30], where ε p is the polaron binding energy, T is the temperature and k B is the Boltzman constant. Using this model for typical emission lines of width 5meV at T=5K, the polaron binding energy is equal to ~ 30meV, which is significantly larger than binding energies of EMPs observed typically for bulk CdMnTe [19] and CdMnTe QWs [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In turn, these aligned local moments act back on the exciton's spin, which lowers the exciton's energy, further localizes the exciton, and further stabilizes the polaron. The stability and binding energy of EMPs therefore depends on the detailed interplay between many factors including the exciton lifetime, the polaron formation time, the exchange field B ex , sample dimensionality, and temperature.EMPs and collective magnetic phenomena have been experimentally studied in a variety of Mn 2+ -doped semiconductor nanostructures, including CdMnSe and CdMnTe-based epilayers and quantum wells [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42], selfassembled CdMnSe and CdMnTe quantum dots grown by molecular-beam epitaxy [14][15][16][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], and most recently in CdMnSe nanocrystals synthesized via colloidal techniques [8,28]. Common measurement techniques include the analysis of conventional (i.e., non-resonant) PL [8, 14, 15,18,21,28,39] and time-resolved PL [8, 16,28,34,35,40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the diffusion model [7] is in conflict with the experimental findings [1][2][3][4], as they point to the exponential dependence of E p on t.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…
It is shown that non-scalar spin-spin interactions rather than spinlattice coupling or spin diffusion control the dynamics of the magnetization formation visible in time-resolved luminescence and SQUID magnetometry.PACS numbers: 78.55.Et, 75.50.Rr Progress in the application of short light pulses for monitoring of dynamical processes has made it possible to trace the emerging of exciton magnetic polarons (EMP) after optical injection of carriers across the band gap in diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMS) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In this paper we discuss mechanisms which might account for the fast dynamics of the polaron formation in DMS.

Consider a carrier trapped at t = O in a localized state.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation