“…Accumulation of bubbles, which hinder the deposition by blocking the interelectrode gap region, is a reason for the nonimplementation of electrodeposition over longer periods. This is explained based on the mass transport of the ions during the off time resulting in the replenishment of the ions [27], Another study suggests that there is an optimum duty cycle range (0.4-0.5) that results in high dense deposition [28], Literature suggests that pulsed current has higher current den sity and it also intensifies the asymmetrical distribution of current to produce a fine grained, smoother finished structure [29], Tradi tionally, it is believed that electrochemical systems are insensitive to high frequency (>10 kHz) variations in current and voltage [30,31], but recent electrochemical machining studies suggest a localization effect of nanosecond (very high frequency) pulse vol tages [32,33]. Some of the factors that affect the quality of deposition are the voltage, pulse period, electrolyte concentration, tool electrode speed, electrode shape, electrolyte circulation, and additives in the electrolyte [24,26].…”