1999
DOI: 10.1007/s003590050331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of the site of effect of a wasp's venom in the cockroach escape circuitry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Stung cockroaches show very little spontaneous or provoked activity such as escape (Fouad et al, 1994;Libersat et al, 1999). In contrast, our results did not show any differences between stung and control cockroaches in spontaneous or provoked grooming, righting behavior, or ability to fly in a wind tunnel (Weisel-Eichler and Libersat, 2002).…”
Section: Wasp Venom Injection Induces Long-term Hypokinesia and Changcontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…Stung cockroaches show very little spontaneous or provoked activity such as escape (Fouad et al, 1994;Libersat et al, 1999). In contrast, our results did not show any differences between stung and control cockroaches in spontaneous or provoked grooming, righting behavior, or ability to fly in a wind tunnel (Weisel-Eichler and Libersat, 2002).…”
Section: Wasp Venom Injection Induces Long-term Hypokinesia and Changcontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…We have shown that these behavioral modifications are evoked by the sting in the head rather than by the sting in the thorax (Fouad et al, 1994). In addition, we have shown that the venom has no effect on the cockroach's neuromuscular junction (Fouad et al, 1996) and that specific motor behaviors are modulated while others, such as flight, are little affected (Fouad et al, 1994;Libersat et al, 1999;Weisel-Eichler and Libersat, 2002). Thus, the venom appears to target the central nervous system (CNS) in the head to modulate specific behaviors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Instead, it applies the unique strategy of behavioral modulation of the cockroach (Fouad et al, 1994(Fouad et al, , 1996Piek et al, 1984;Weisel-Eichler et al, 1999;Williams, 1942). The stung prey first grooms extensively (WeiselEichler et al, 1999), after which it becomes sluggish and is not responsive to various stimuli (Fouad et al, 1994(Fouad et al, , 1996Libersat et al, 1999). The wasp grabs one of the antennae of the cockroach, which follows docilely to a suitable oviposition location, where it will serve a few days later as an immobilized fresh food source for the wasp's offspring (Williams, 1942;Piek et al, 1984;Fouad et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The cockroach is not paralyzed, but rendered helplessly submissive after the wasp stings into its head to cause 30 min of excessive grooming (Weisel-Eichler et al, 1999) followed by a 2-to 5-week long lethargic state (Fouad et al, 1994(Fouad et al, , 1996Libersat et al, 1999). In this lethargic state, the cockroach is unresponsive, and does not initiate movement (Fouad et al, 1994(Fouad et al, , 1996Libersat et al, 1999). It is docilely led by the wasp to a burrow to be later consumed alive by its larvae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%