2005
DOI: 10.1002/cne.20462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of the Na+‐activated K+ channel Slick in the rat central nervous system

Abstract: Na+-activated K+ currents (K(Na)) have been reported in multiple neuronal nuclei and the properties of K(Na) vary in different cell types. We have described previously the distribution of Slack, a Na+-activated K+ channel subunit. Another recently cloned Na+-activated K+ channel is Slick, which differs from Slack in its rapid activation and its sensitivity to intracellular ATP levels. We now report the localization of Slick in the rat central nervous system using in situ and immunohistochemical techniques. As … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
88
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(46 reference statements)
3
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The isolated sodium current and the inward current component of the combined Na ϩ and K ϩ current did not differ, either ( p Ͼ 0.15 for half-duration, rise time, and peak current amplitude). The lack of electrophysiological evidence for K Na -mediated currents in rat hippocampal MFBs is consistent with immunohistochemical studies on Slick (Slo2.1) and Slack (Slo2.2) (Bhattacharjee et al, 2002(Bhattacharjee et al, , 2005, which did not show positive antibody staining in the mossy fiber tract of rat hippocampus.…”
Section: Lack Of Evidence For Nasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The isolated sodium current and the inward current component of the combined Na ϩ and K ϩ current did not differ, either ( p Ͼ 0.15 for half-duration, rise time, and peak current amplitude). The lack of electrophysiological evidence for K Na -mediated currents in rat hippocampal MFBs is consistent with immunohistochemical studies on Slick (Slo2.1) and Slack (Slo2.2) (Bhattacharjee et al, 2002(Bhattacharjee et al, , 2005, which did not show positive antibody staining in the mossy fiber tract of rat hippocampus.…”
Section: Lack Of Evidence For Nasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In hippocampus, the Slick (Slo2.1) channel is expressed in both CA1 and CA3 regions, in which it colocalizes with the mAChR1 receptor (Fig. 8C,D) (Levey et al, 1995;Bhattacharjee et al, 2005). Finally, mGluR1 receptors are expressed in hippocampus (Shigemoto et al, 1997).…”
Section: Slo2 Channels and G␣ Q -Coupled Protein Receptors Are Coexprmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The goal of these colabeling experiments was to verify that both receptors and channels could be expressed in the same types of identified cells. Both Slo2.1 and Slo2.2 are very widely expressed throughout the CNS (Bhattacharjee et al, 2002(Bhattacharjee et al, , 2005. Figure 8 shows some examples of colocalization.…”
Section: Slo2 Channels and G␣ Q -Coupled Protein Receptors Are Coexprmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Na ϩ -activated K ϩ channels (K Na ) have been shown to exist in many types of neurons (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). They are encoded for by two genes, Slick (Slo 2.1) and Slack (Slo 2.2) (11)(12)(13), and display a wide distribution in many regions in the brain (12,14,15). Most of the information available on these channels is related to their activation by Na ϩ influx through voltage-gated channels, but it has been difficult to assess their physiological role.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%