2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of prostatic tumor’s infection based on normalized mutual information MRI image segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Utilizing the soybean root data, which had been annotated with cell type information, we applied SpaGCN software 19 to cluster the raw SRT data consisting of 27,878 genes into six clusters. The clustering results achieved an Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) 20,21 value of 0.49, Accuracy (ACC) value of 0.66, Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) 21,22 value of 0.54, and Fowlkes-Mallows Index (FMI) 21 value of 0.66 in Fig. 2e.…”
Section: Srt Data Contains Noise That Impedes Downstream Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing the soybean root data, which had been annotated with cell type information, we applied SpaGCN software 19 to cluster the raw SRT data consisting of 27,878 genes into six clusters. The clustering results achieved an Adjusted Rand Index (ARI) 20,21 value of 0.49, Accuracy (ACC) value of 0.66, Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) 21,22 value of 0.54, and Fowlkes-Mallows Index (FMI) 21 value of 0.66 in Fig. 2e.…”
Section: Srt Data Contains Noise That Impedes Downstream Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GD judges the final registration result by measuring the change of low-frequency gray value due to gradient reduction. The formula is shown in Equations ( 5)- (7) in Appendix.…”
Section: The Normalized Mutual Information-gradient DI Erencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, for evaluation of the results of the 2D–3D image registration, the selected similarity measurement function includes only the gray-level information of a single image and lacks the spatial information of the image as an aid, resulting in large errors in the results of the final similarity evaluation, such as Normalized Mutual (NM) and Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) ( 6 , 7 ). In the 2D–3D registration process, the selected optimization algorithm considers only the optimal value and it does not consider improving the registration efficiency, such as Powell and Gradient Descent (GD) ( 8 , 9 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This depends on the expert's medical knowledge and experience and has strong subjectivity. As a result, different experts may have different conclusions [ 7 ]. Additionally, manual segmentation is time-consuming, labor-intensive, and unable to deal with large amount medical information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%