2019
DOI: 10.1109/tsp.2018.2883034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of Near-Field Sources Based on Linear Prediction and Oblique Projection Operator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, there are 2(M + N + 1) equality constraints on these matrix/scalar variables. When (M + N + 1) d, the flop count in each Newton step is approximately 6(M + N + 1) 4 .…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, there are 2(M + N + 1) equality constraints on these matrix/scalar variables. When (M + N + 1) d, the flop count in each Newton step is approximately 6(M + N + 1) 4 .…”
Section: Complexity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the deployment of powerful location-based applications such as enhanced 911 services, asset management, and workflow automation, wireless location is a classical problem and has attracted intensive research recently [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Technically, wireless location can be based on a variety of different kinds of measurements, such as range [7], angle [8], energy [9], visible light [10,11], or fingerprinting [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, the dominant terms cλ 2 π P S2 cos 2 θ of (16) and (22) are equal, implying that the near-field DOA CRB is barely affected by the power profile for ranges that are not too small. To go further, we look into the second-order term (in 1/r 2 ) in (16) and (22). For example for θ = 0, we get:…”
Section: Constant Gain Vs Range and Angle-dependent Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter makes use of the second-order Taylor expansion of the time delay parameter, with constant amplitude gain however. Numerous methods have used these approximations, such as a polynomial rooting approach [16], an high-order ESPRIT algorithm [17], a weighted linear prediction method [18], an ESPRIT/MUSIC procedure exploiting subarrays [19], a two-stage MUSIC algorithm [20], a least-square procedure [21], a prediction and oblique projection operator method [22] and many other approaches. Furthermore, these approximations facilitate the CRB derivations (see e.g., [23]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], a novel localization algorithm via cumulant matrix reconstruction for mixed sources scenario was proposed, it avoids DOA search for NF sources and achieves a more reasonable classification of the source types. [21] investigates the localization of multiple near-field narrowband sources with a symmetric uniform linear array, and a new linear prediction approach based on the truncated singular value decomposition (LPATS) was proposed by taking an advantage of the anti-diagonal elements of the noiseless array covariance matrix. By exploiting the noncircular information of the signals, [22] proposed a novel localization method for mixed NF and FF sources using a symmetric uniform linear array (ULA).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%