2009
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-1986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of Insulinomas to Regions of the Pancreas by Intraarterial Calcium Stimulation: The NIH Experience

Abstract: The CaStim has remained vastly superior to abdominal US, CT, or MRI over time as a preoperative localizing tool for insulinomas. The utility of the CaStim for this purpose and in this setting is thus validated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
127
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(138 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
127
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Selective intra-arterial injection of the pancreatic arteries with calcium and hepatic venous sampling for insulin, first introduced 17 years ago (18), correlates anatomy with function, and in many series, it appears to be the most sensitive method for regionalisation of insulinoma. In a previous series of 25 surgically proven sporadic insulinomas, calcium stimulation correctly regionalised 88% of tumours, compared to MRI in 43% and CT in only 17% (19), and this high diagnostic accuracy was maintained in a recent update on a further 45 patients (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Selective intra-arterial injection of the pancreatic arteries with calcium and hepatic venous sampling for insulin, first introduced 17 years ago (18), correlates anatomy with function, and in many series, it appears to be the most sensitive method for regionalisation of insulinoma. In a previous series of 25 surgically proven sporadic insulinomas, calcium stimulation correctly regionalised 88% of tumours, compared to MRI in 43% and CT in only 17% (19), and this high diagnostic accuracy was maintained in a recent update on a further 45 patients (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In another series of 39 sporadic cases of insulinoma, the accuracy of CT scanning was 35% with a false negative rate of 49% and a false positive localisation rate of 16%. For MRI, the accuracy was 30% with a false negative rate of 57% and a false positive rate of 13% (20). While some small radiological series have suggested greater sensitivity for both CT and MRI (13,15), in general, the low accuracy of cross-sectional imaging has in part driven the development of more invasive methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations