2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of growth estimates using non-parametric imputation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the western part of Finland the growth was only slightly overestimated or underestimated in some areas. In southern Finland our tree-simulator results are in line with study by Sironen et al (2008), where performance of non-parametric estimation method was compared with the same tree-level models of Hynynen et al (2002) in different parts of Finland. In their study the tree-level models overestimated the basal area growth in the southern parts of Finland, while in the northern parts the basal area growth was mainly underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In the western part of Finland the growth was only slightly overestimated or underestimated in some areas. In southern Finland our tree-simulator results are in line with study by Sironen et al (2008), where performance of non-parametric estimation method was compared with the same tree-level models of Hynynen et al (2002) in different parts of Finland. In their study the tree-level models overestimated the basal area growth in the southern parts of Finland, while in the northern parts the basal area growth was mainly underestimated.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Growth predictions with empirical growth models can contain large errors, which also vary between different geographic areas. Sironen et al (2008) showed that the root-mean-square errors of 5-year estimates of diameter growth using a simulator similar to the tree simulator we used here varied from 38.2 to 66.1%, depending on the geographic region across Finland. Mäkinen et al (2008) reported that the SDs of prediction errors after a 20-year simulation caused by errors in the growth models were 12, 6, 18 and 14% for the attributes H plot , D plot , BA plot and N plot , respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…To mitigate this problem, several different options are available: (1) to use models that can be calibrated using local data such as kriging/mixed models where data are available (Räty et al 2011;Räty and Kangas 2012), (2) to use geographically weighted regression (Zhang and Gove 2005), or (3) to use a spatial range when selecting the observations in non-parametric approaches like k-nn (Sironen et al 2008). The relative efficiency of such approaches remains to be studied.…”
Section: Field Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%