1978
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.75.3.1389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 on native small ribosomal subunits

Abstract: Te localization of eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF-3) on native small ribosomal subunits has been established by electron microscopy through a comparison of native small ribosomal subunits with derived subunits and with native subunits stripped of eIF-3. Small subunits derived from reticulocyte ribosomes by the puromycin/KCI method are seen in electron micrographs as elongated particles, divided by a heavily stained partition into approximately one-third and twthird domains. Most particles (60-70%) observe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…eIF2-ternary complex also binds to the interface side of the 40S subunit (Bommer et al 1991) and could therefore enhance eIF3's activity in preventing subunit reassociation in a similar manner. Although it has been suggested that eIF3 is attached to the back lobes of the 40S subunit, oriented away from the intersubunit interface, which would necessarily imply that eIF3's dissociation/antiassociation activity is due to induced conformational change rather than to steric hindrance (Srivastava et al 1992;Válasek et al 2003), this contradicts other studies (Emanuilov et al 1978;Lütsch et al 1986). The mechanism by which eIF3 dissociates ribosomes therefore remains an open question.…”
Section: Kolupaeva Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…eIF2-ternary complex also binds to the interface side of the 40S subunit (Bommer et al 1991) and could therefore enhance eIF3's activity in preventing subunit reassociation in a similar manner. Although it has been suggested that eIF3 is attached to the back lobes of the 40S subunit, oriented away from the intersubunit interface, which would necessarily imply that eIF3's dissociation/antiassociation activity is due to induced conformational change rather than to steric hindrance (Srivastava et al 1992;Válasek et al 2003), this contradicts other studies (Emanuilov et al 1978;Lütsch et al 1986). The mechanism by which eIF3 dissociates ribosomes therefore remains an open question.…”
Section: Kolupaeva Et Alcontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Although biophysical data on the location of eIF3 bound to the 40S subunit are contradictory (Emanuilov et al 1978;Lütsch et al 1986;Srivastava et al 1992), biochemical data (Válasek et al 2003) support a model in which eIF3 binds to the solvent side of the 40S subunit, where the eIF3's and 40S subunit's mRNA-binding surfaces could either dock together to form a mRNA-binding tunnel or eIF3 by itself could extend the mRNA-binding channel of the 40S subunit outside the interface surface.…”
Section: Kolupaeva Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Electron microscopic analysis of native 40S subunits suggests that eIF-3 is located in the neck region of the subunit close to the ribosomal subunit interface [3]. In the present experiments we have shown by chemical cross-linking with the bifunctional reagent DEB and the heterobifunctional reagent ABAI that the 66 000 dalton subunit of eIF-3 is covalently attached to 18S rRNA in the binary 40S-eIF-3 complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Emanuilov et al (28) found that the binding site of eIF-3 on 40 S N subunits was partly overlapping the interface region of the particle, suggesting that the ribosome-bound factor directly interferes with subunit joining. However, others have found that eIF-3 binds to the 40 S subunit without interfering with the interface (29,30) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%