2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2018.8593659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of an Acoustic Fish-Tag using the Time-of-Arrival Measurements: Preliminary results using eXogenous Kalman Filter

Abstract: This paper addresses the source localization problem of an acoustic fish-tag using the Time-of-Arrival measurement of an acoustic signal, transmitted by the fish-tag. The Time-of-Arrival measurements denote the pseudo-range information between the acoustic receiver and the fish-tag, except that the Time-of-Transmission of the acoustic signal is unknown. Starting with the pseudo-range measurement equation, a globally valid quasi-linear time-varying measurement model is presented that is independent of the Time-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the high SNR readings where most of the tag detections were received definitively show that the vehicle system was able to collaboratively position a genuinely small acoustic transmitter tag in an uncontrolled environment. Compared with the results presented in [11] and [12], the power of the tracked transmitter was 21 dB lower (137 vs. 158 dB Re 1 µPa at 1 m [30]), and was transmitting with significantly longer update intervals (30 s -90 s pseudorandom interval vs. 7 s fixed interval).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, the high SNR readings where most of the tag detections were received definitively show that the vehicle system was able to collaboratively position a genuinely small acoustic transmitter tag in an uncontrolled environment. Compared with the results presented in [11] and [12], the power of the tracked transmitter was 21 dB lower (137 vs. 158 dB Re 1 µPa at 1 m [30]), and was transmitting with significantly longer update intervals (30 s -90 s pseudorandom interval vs. 7 s fixed interval).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recursive filters that suppress noise are therefore crucial, along with adaptive sampling strategies that optimize receiver (vehicle) position with respect to geometry and detection probability. Preliminary results presented in [12] and [11] demonstrate the feasibility of this approach with acoustic receivers carried by autonomous surface vehicles. Our goal is to extend this approach and demonstrate its viability even for smaller and less frequently transmitting tags in an uncontrolled environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation