2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems (ICIAS2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icias.2012.6306166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of acne lesion through template matching

Abstract: RFDOL]DWLRQ RI $FQH /HVLRQ WKURXJK 7HPSODWH 0DWFKLQJ -DZDG +XPD\XQ $DPLU 6DHHG 0DOLN 6DPLU %UDKLP %HOKDRXDUL 1LGDO .DPHO )HOL[ %RRQ %LQ Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To conduct a systematic review on acne images segmentation methods, an adapted PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) (Liberati et al, 2009) standard was used. The analysis includes all studies published until April 2019 and explores four databases: Scopus (https://www.scopus.com/home.uri), PubMed Central The review shows that current segmentation methods for acne vulgaris images can be divided into two groups: those algorithms based on classical image processing techniques (Ramli, Malik, Hani, & Yap, 2011a;Chen, Chang, & Cao, 2012;Khongsuwan, Kiattisin, Wongseree, & Leelasantitham, 2012;Humayun, Malik, Belhaouari, Kamel, & Yap, 2012;Liu & Zerubia, 2013;Min, Kong, Yoon, Kim, & Suh, 2013;Malik, Humayun, Kamel, & Yap, 2014;Chantharaphaichi, Uyyanonvara, Sinthanayothin, & Nishihara, 2015;Alamdari, Tavakolian, Alhashim, & Fazel-Rezai, 2016;Kittigul & Uyyanonvara, 2016;Budhi, Adipranata, & Gunawan, 2017;Maroni, Ermidoro, Previdi, & Bigini, 2017) -they consist of a series of steps or operations that have to be applied to an image, for instance color space transformations or contrast modifications. The other group refers to machine learning algorithms (Fujii et al, 2008;Ramli, Malik, Hani, & Yap, 2011b;Madan, Dana, & Cula, 2011;Arifin, Kibria, Firoze, Amini, & Yan, 2012;Chang & Liao, 2013;Khan, Malik, Kamel, Dass, & Affandi, 2015;Alamdari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To conduct a systematic review on acne images segmentation methods, an adapted PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) (Liberati et al, 2009) standard was used. The analysis includes all studies published until April 2019 and explores four databases: Scopus (https://www.scopus.com/home.uri), PubMed Central The review shows that current segmentation methods for acne vulgaris images can be divided into two groups: those algorithms based on classical image processing techniques (Ramli, Malik, Hani, & Yap, 2011a;Chen, Chang, & Cao, 2012;Khongsuwan, Kiattisin, Wongseree, & Leelasantitham, 2012;Humayun, Malik, Belhaouari, Kamel, & Yap, 2012;Liu & Zerubia, 2013;Min, Kong, Yoon, Kim, & Suh, 2013;Malik, Humayun, Kamel, & Yap, 2014;Chantharaphaichi, Uyyanonvara, Sinthanayothin, & Nishihara, 2015;Alamdari, Tavakolian, Alhashim, & Fazel-Rezai, 2016;Kittigul & Uyyanonvara, 2016;Budhi, Adipranata, & Gunawan, 2017;Maroni, Ermidoro, Previdi, & Bigini, 2017) -they consist of a series of steps or operations that have to be applied to an image, for instance color space transformations or contrast modifications. The other group refers to machine learning algorithms (Fujii et al, 2008;Ramli, Malik, Hani, & Yap, 2011b;Madan, Dana, & Cula, 2011;Arifin, Kibria, Firoze, Amini, & Yan, 2012;Chang & Liao, 2013;Khan, Malik, Kamel, Dass, & Affandi, 2015;Alamdari et al, 2016).…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of limitations for each study included in the systematic review showed that algorithms based on classical image processing techniques cannot be totally automatized, mainly because there are some parameters that need to be manually adjusted (Son et al, 2008;Humayun et al, 2012;Budhi et al, 2017;Maroni et al, 2017). That is why in the present work machine learning algorithms are chosen for the implementation of the proposed methodology.…”
Section: Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 20 studies were found. The review showed that current segmentation methods for acne vulgaris images can be divided into two groups: those algorithms based on classical image processing techniques 10‐22 —they consist of a series of steps or operations that have to be applied to an image, for instance colour space transformations or contrast modifications. The other group refers to machine learning algorithms 18,23‐29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing methodologies for acne fluorescence images are both based on classical image processing techniques. However, from the analysis of limitations declared on each analysed study, it can be concluded that algorithms based on these techniques cannot be totally automatized, mainly because there are some parameters that need to be manually adjusted 13,20‐22 . That is why in the present work machine learning algorithms are chosen for the implementation of the proposed methodology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach proved to be affective for counting and recognizing of lesions by letting a system learn the appearance of acne in advance to do matching. [10] Cula employed multispectral imaging and linear discriminant functions with a time varying component into acne detection and counting system. Gaussian mixture models have been used to detect and register facial acnes over multiple time points, so there must be an alignment technique to synchronize pictures from several times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%