2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3130233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization, Mapping, Navigation, and Inspection Methods in In-Pipe Robots: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
(166 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wheeled type inpipe robots are classified as simple structure type, wall pressed type, screw drive type. Wall pressed wheeled type robot has large traction force and better climbing capability as compared to simple structure wheel type robot [1,2]. Caterpillar type robot has no ability to climb and bigger in size, snake type robot has complex in structure and difficult to control, legged type robot has complex in structure and needs more actuator, inchworm type robots are simple in structure but lower speed mobility whereas PIG type robots has uncontrolled motion state as its motion depends on the flowing medium inside the pipe [3].…”
Section: Existing In-pipe Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wheeled type inpipe robots are classified as simple structure type, wall pressed type, screw drive type. Wall pressed wheeled type robot has large traction force and better climbing capability as compared to simple structure wheel type robot [1,2]. Caterpillar type robot has no ability to climb and bigger in size, snake type robot has complex in structure and difficult to control, legged type robot has complex in structure and needs more actuator, inchworm type robots are simple in structure but lower speed mobility whereas PIG type robots has uncontrolled motion state as its motion depends on the flowing medium inside the pipe [3].…”
Section: Existing In-pipe Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of leakage localization using in-pipe robots depends both on the localization techniques and the leak detection methods. This work will only cover the detection methods as reviews for in-pipe localization methods are extensive [19], [20], [21].…”
Section: In-pipe Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires considerable adaptation to existing pipelines and increases the construction costs of new ones. The second technique uses special probes (e.g., SmartBall and Sahara) to explore the pipeline [ 10 , 11 ]. To facilitate the insertion/retrieval of these probes, special devices have to be built, and the pressure has to be reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%