2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.101.081405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization landscape for Dirac fermions

Abstract: In the theory of Anderson localization, a landscape function predicts where wave functions localize in a disordered medium, without requiring the solution of an eigenvalue problem. It is known how to construct the localization landscape for the scalar wave equation in a random potential, or equivalently for the Schrödinger equation of spinless electrons. Here we generalize the concept to the Dirac equation, which includes the effects of spin-orbit coupling and allows to study quantum localization in graphene o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ever, it should be noted that there is still a significant energy gap from the data points at 100-500 keV to the solar Gamow energy, E Gamow = 27 keV. Summing detector data from LUNA reach down to the lowest energies hitherto measured, E = 70 keV, and provide a value for the total S-factor, summed from all transitions, of S(E = 70 keV)=1.74±0.14 stat ±0.14 syst keV barn [33,36]. However, by design the summing data cannot constrain the partial S-factor for capture to the 6.79 MeV level very well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2 ever, it should be noted that there is still a significant energy gap from the data points at 100-500 keV to the solar Gamow energy, E Gamow = 27 keV. Summing detector data from LUNA reach down to the lowest energies hitherto measured, E = 70 keV, and provide a value for the total S-factor, summed from all transitions, of S(E = 70 keV)=1.74±0.14 stat ±0.14 syst keV barn [33,36]. However, by design the summing data cannot constrain the partial S-factor for capture to the 6.79 MeV level very well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The understanding that the pure tunnelling picture in LLT is only applicable at very low energies is novel, and establishes when and how one can use LLT in a useful manner. Two very recent papers [67,68] have developed generalisations of LLT to allow treatment of systems with internal degrees of freedom, with [68] explicitly extending their technique to arbitrary energies, while the method in [67] is amenable to such an extension [68]. These generalisations of course come at the price of added complexity, but have additional advantages as well: for example, the method of [68] removes the constraint that the physical potential cannot be negative on any part of the system domain, and yields some helpful features arising from the different normalisation of the eigenstates chosen therein.…”
Section: Breakdown At Higher Energiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low background conditions observed in underground experiments can only be fully exploited for accelerator-based studies if there is no additional background induced by the ion beam. As the Felsenkeller accelerator is not yet running, this point has been addressed in a recent experiment using an intensive, 9 particle-µA, 12 C beam at the surface-based HZDR 3 MV Tandetron accelerator in Rossendorf ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Background Studies With Ion Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the same approach, the 14 N(p,γ) 15 O reaction controlling the CNO cycle in the Sun [11,12], the reactions controlling Big Bang production of 6 Li [13,14] and 7 Li [6], and several reactions of higher hydrogen burning have recently been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%