2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2020.102879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization for mixed far-field and near-field sources utilizing improved symmetric nested array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last part, the superiority of the proposed array is verified by some performance simulation experiments, which are compared with the other three array geometries, SNA [29], symmetric double nested array (SDNA) [30], and ISNA [23]. The total number of elements is Q = 31.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the last part, the superiority of the proposed array is verified by some performance simulation experiments, which are compared with the other three array geometries, SNA [29], symmetric double nested array (SDNA) [30], and ISNA [23]. The total number of elements is Q = 31.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To better quantify the performance of STCA, we compare it with SNA [29], SDNA [30], improve symmetric nested array (ISNA) [23] in four aspects: the number of consecutive lags, the number of unique lags, physical array aperture, and mutual coupling coefficient for different total numbers of physical sensors, Q .…”
Section: Symmetric Thined Coprime Arraymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section, through the different simulations to assess the performance of the proposed algorithm. Specifically, we compare the proposed algorithm with oblique projection MU-SIC (OPMUSIC) algorithm [14], Mixed-order MUSIC algorithm [19], MSA algorithm [25] and LASSO algorithm [21]. In all simulations, the inter-sensor spacing is d = λ/4, the signal model is e jϕt where the phase is uniformly distributed in [0, 2π], and the parameter ε in ( 17) is set to 10 −8 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%