1985
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.31.4866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization effects in the scattering of light from a randomly rough grating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 245 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This we believe is the main reason for the reduced amplitude of the mean differential reflection coefficients in these cases relative to those of Fig. 2 [16,17,18,19]. However, the structures seen as peaks in the backscattering directions of the cross-polarized scattering, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This we believe is the main reason for the reduced amplitude of the mean differential reflection coefficients in these cases relative to those of Fig. 2 [16,17,18,19]. However, the structures seen as peaks in the backscattering directions of the cross-polarized scattering, Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This is believed to be caused by the relatively large angle of incidence, for which it is known that coherent effects become weaker [16]. The CPU time spent on various stages of the calculations for one realization of the surface profile function and one angle of incidence.…”
Section: Fig 2: (Color Online)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the surface polariton propagates along the rough surface, then it is scattered into a volume wave due to the roughness, at the same time, a reverse partner exists with a path travelling in the opposite direction. These two paths can interfere constructively near the backscattering direction to produce a peak 17,18,19 . However, in one dimension 21 , this peak can only be observed for a (T M ) polarized incident wave because a surface polariton only exists for this polarization.…”
Section: A Rough Surface Separating To Different Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of small-roughness metallic surfaces this peak was originaly explained by the infinite perturbation theory, 17,18,19 and further developments 21 have shown that the major contribution for the enhanced backscattering peak comes from the second order term in the field perturbation. However, in the one dimensional case the enhanced backscattering for a rough surface, appears only for a (T M ) incident wave due to the fact that plasmons polaritons only exist for this polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation