2001
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-01-01354-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization effects and measure source terms in numerical schemes for balance laws

Abstract: Abstract. This paper investigates the behavior of numerical schemes for nonlinear conservation laws with source terms. We concentrate on two significant examples: relaxation approximations and genuinely nonhomogeneous scalar laws. The main tool in our analysis is the extensive use of weak limits and nonconservative products which allow us to describe accurately the operations achieved in practice when using Riemann-based numerical schemes. Some illustrative and relevant computational results are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the special subcase which is presented in the introduction of a single equilibrium, it is not completely original, and combined with a Riemann solver it can be interpreted as a well balanced scheme following denominations and ideas of Greenberg et al [11]. Then a proof of convergence relying on much stronger assumptions can be found in Gosse [10]. More generally it falls in a class which has been advocated recently by several authors (see Greenberg et al, for source terms which only depend on x, Gosse and Leroux [9] for sources depending on u only, LeVeque [17], Vazquez-Cendon [26] on upwind discretization of source terms for the Saint-Venant system, Bermudez et al [1] for upwind treatment of sources for 2D shallow water equations on unstructured meshes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the special subcase which is presented in the introduction of a single equilibrium, it is not completely original, and combined with a Riemann solver it can be interpreted as a well balanced scheme following denominations and ideas of Greenberg et al [11]. Then a proof of convergence relying on much stronger assumptions can be found in Gosse [10]. More generally it falls in a class which has been advocated recently by several authors (see Greenberg et al, for source terms which only depend on x, Gosse and Leroux [9] for sources depending on u only, LeVeque [17], Vazquez-Cendon [26] on upwind discretization of source terms for the Saint-Venant system, Bermudez et al [1] for upwind treatment of sources for 2D shallow water equations on unstructured meshes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this section is to exhibit a sufficient condition on the parameter a, which so far is still not determined, that ensures a discrete entropy inequality of the form 19) which is a discrete counterpart of the energy inequality (2.7) verified by the exact solutions, thus assessing the stability of the method. Here, the numerical entropy flux G(U L , U R ) is to be determined.…”
Section: Non-linear Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of taking a constant-by-cell cross-section goes back to the works of LeRoux and co-workers [21,20] and to the paper of Isaacson and Temple [27], which have been extended by Gosse and co-workers [18,19,1]. The consequence of such a discretisation is to concentrate the source term at the interfaces of the mesh and to ease the construction of well-balanced schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be rewritten like in [31], by introducing a steady discontinuous variable a(x) ∈ BV (R), replacing the righthand side of (1.3) by ∓ 1 2λ G(∂ x ϕ; w, z)∂ x a and adding the trivial equation ∂ t a = 0. For discontinuous w, z, this formulation can be unstable because of the products "Heaviside × Dirac"; however, it has been rigorously shown in [20] that these nonconservative products can be rigorously defined as weak limits in the framework of [34] thanks to the uniform BV estimates which come from the linear convection in (1.3) (similar estimates for scalar balance laws are previously given in [15]). …”
Section: Numerical Stiffness and Non-conservative Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%