2004
DOI: 10.1080/0951508042000202417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization and the new phrenology: a review essay on William Uttal'sThe new phrenology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, this monograph generated innumerous ripples of comments and responses enfolding different degrees of optimism (e.g., Hadley, 2003; Henson, 2005; Hubbard, 2001; Landreth & Richardson, 2004) such as those of Uttal that identified several problems regarding the study of a possible neural instantiation of mental processes (e.g., Hardcastle & Stewart, 2002; McGinn, 2006; Uttal, 2002, 2005), and those of others that are more confident about the possibility of exploring how the mind works and about finding associations with the central nervous system (e.g., Bechtel, 2002; Hadley, 2003; Hubbard, 2001). In this context, by reviewing this book, we intended to revisit the author’s position concerning the philosophic, conceptual, and technical issues underlying the associations between brain-related physiological signals and psychological faculties.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…As expected, this monograph generated innumerous ripples of comments and responses enfolding different degrees of optimism (e.g., Hadley, 2003; Henson, 2005; Hubbard, 2001; Landreth & Richardson, 2004) such as those of Uttal that identified several problems regarding the study of a possible neural instantiation of mental processes (e.g., Hardcastle & Stewart, 2002; McGinn, 2006; Uttal, 2002, 2005), and those of others that are more confident about the possibility of exploring how the mind works and about finding associations with the central nervous system (e.g., Bechtel, 2002; Hadley, 2003; Hubbard, 2001). In this context, by reviewing this book, we intended to revisit the author’s position concerning the philosophic, conceptual, and technical issues underlying the associations between brain-related physiological signals and psychological faculties.…”
supporting
confidence: 59%
“…One often heard criticism in discussions about the usefulness of social neuroscience measurements (especially concerning brain imaging techniques such as fMRI) that social neuroscience is simply a new form of phrenology (Uttal, 2002; but see Landreth & Richardson, 2004). Although we think that there is much to learn from brain imaging in itself-as it allows us to link social psychological processes to knowledge about specifi c functions of brain regions-we think it is important for researchers to move beyond simply showing effects on fMRI, EEG, or ERP measures.…”
Section: Limitations and Recommendations For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the book of Uttal (2001) attacks the idea of brain localization and raise the concerns about "neo-phrenology". On the other hand, Hubbard (2003) and Landreth and Richardson (2004) disagree with Uttal (2001) and believe that the two perspectives should not be put on the opposite position. They believe the two theory are, to some extent, complementary to each other.…”
Section: Real Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%