2014
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.90.052808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization and centrality in networks

Abstract: Eigenvector centrality is a common measure of the importance of nodes in a network. Here we show that under common conditions the eigenvector centrality displays a localization transition that causes most of the weight of the centrality to concentrate on a small number of nodes in the network. In this regime the measure is no longer useful for distinguishing among the remaining nodes and its efficacy as a network metric is impaired. As a remedy, we propose an alternative centrality measure based on the nonback… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
363
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 269 publications
(369 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
6
363
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These walks include at least one back-and-forth flip between a pair of nodes. One concrete justification for the use of nonbacktracking walks is that localization effects can sometimes be avoided [17,24,31]. In the context of community detection, a nonbacktracking version of spectral clustering was proposed in [20].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These walks include at least one back-and-forth flip between a pair of nodes. One concrete justification for the use of nonbacktracking walks is that localization effects can sometimes be avoided [17,24,31]. In the context of community detection, a nonbacktracking version of spectral clustering was proposed in [20].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, quantities defined using the concept of nonbacktracking walks have been proved to be useful in the framework of undirected networks when tackling decycling problems, as well as dismantling problems and the problem of optimal percolation (see, e.g., [25,26] and references therein). A nonbacktracking analogue of eigenvector centrality was developed in [24] for undirected networks, and a Katz version was proposed in [14] and studied from a matrix polynomial perspective. However, none of those references handle directed edges.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such localisation poses a problem for conventional eigenvector centrality because most of the weight of the centrality concentrates on a small number of nodes, thus necessitating the random-hop term in the Google matrix [33]. On the other hand, the relatively homogeneous degree distribution in Erdös-Rényi random networks is expected to favour a delocalised phase of the walker, as observed in [7].…”
Section: Localisation-delocalisation Transitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, both quantities have been already used to characterize the eigenfunctions of the adjacency matrices of random network models (see some examples in Refs. [31,36,39,42,48,[53][54][55][56][57][66][67][68][69]). …”
Section: B Entropic Eigenfunction Localization Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%