Abstract:With the European Commission (EC) and European Space Agency's (ESA) plans to develop a new satellite navigation system, Galileo and the modernisation of GPS well underway the integrity of such systems is as much, if not more, of a concern as ever. Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) refers to the integrity monitoring of the GPS/Galileo navigation signals autonomously performed by the receiver independent of any external reference systems, apart from the navigation signals themselves. Quality measur… Show more
“…Integrity is defined as a measure of the trust which can be placed in the correctness of the information supplied by the total system; integrity includes the ability of a system to provide timely and valid measurements to users ESA (n.d.). Three key components have been proposed for integrity monitoring: 1) fault detection, 2) fault isolation, and 3) removal of faulty measurement sources from the estimates Hewitson et al (2004). The European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) and the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), Hewitson (2003), are developed to form a redundant source of information for the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) in order to perform integrity monitoring by providing correction information.…”
Section: Integrity Of Localization Systemsmentioning
“…Integrity is defined as a measure of the trust which can be placed in the correctness of the information supplied by the total system; integrity includes the ability of a system to provide timely and valid measurements to users ESA (n.d.). Three key components have been proposed for integrity monitoring: 1) fault detection, 2) fault isolation, and 3) removal of faulty measurement sources from the estimates Hewitson et al (2004). The European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) and the Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS), Hewitson (2003), are developed to form a redundant source of information for the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) in order to perform integrity monitoring by providing correction information.…”
Section: Integrity Of Localization Systemsmentioning
“…For its generalization to recursive quality control in dynamic systems, see Teunissen and Salzmann (1989), Teunissen (1990). The DIA method has found its use in a wide range of applications, for example, for the quality control of geodetic networks (DGCC 1982), for geophysical and structural deformation analyses (Van Mierlo 1980;Kok 1982), for different GPS applications (Van der Marel and Kosters 1990;Teunissen 1998b;Tiberius 1998;Hewitson et al 2004;Perfetti 2006;Drevelle and Bonnifait 2011;Fan et al 2011) and for various configurations of integrated navigation systems (Teunissen 1989;Salzmann 1993;Gillissen and Elema 1996).…”
The DIA method for the detection, identification and adaptation of model misspecifications combines estimation with testing. The aim of the present contribution is to introduce a unifying framework for the rigorous capture of this combination. By using a canonical model formulation and a partitioning of misclosure space, we show that the whole estimation-testing scheme can be captured in one single DIA estimator. We study the characteristics of this estimator and discuss some of its distributional properties. With the distribution of the DIA estimator provided, one can then study all the characteristics of the combined estimation and testing scheme, as well as analyse how they propagate into final outcomes. Examples are given, as well as a discussion on how the distributional properties compare with their usage in practice.
“…Using the results of these studies Li (1986) then defined the Minimal Separable Bias (MSB) as the smallest bias that can be confidently identified for a set Type III error. Applying the MSB to the field of navigation, the separability of various satellite constellations has been analysed by Hewitson et al (2004), and Hewitson and Wang (2006).…”
In Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) positioning, it is standard practice to apply the Fault Detection and Exclusion (FDE) procedure iteratively, in order to exclude all faulty measurements and then ensure reliable positioning results. Since it is often only necessary to consider a single fault in a Receiver Autonomous Integrity Monitoring (RAIM) procedure, it would be ideal if a fault could be correctly identified. Thus, fault detection does not need to be applied in an iterative sense. One way of evaluating whether fault detection needs to be reapplied is to determine the probability of a wrong exclusion. To date, however, limited progress has been made in evaluating such probabilities. In this paper the relationships between different parameters are analysed in terms of the probability of correct and incorrect identification. Using this knowledge, a practical strategy for incorporating the probability of a wrong exclusion into the FDE procedure is developed. The theoretical findings are then demonstrated using a GPS single point positioning example.
K E Y
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations鈥揷itations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.