Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2016.2525803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locality Sensitive Deep Learning for Detection and Classification of Nuclei in Routine Colon Cancer Histology Images

Abstract: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way.Publisher's statement: "© 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
703
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,083 publications
(774 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
703
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Many works add features derived from deep networks to existing feature sets or compare (2013) Detection of basal cell carcinoma H&E Convolutional auto-encoder neural network Malon and Cosatto (2013) Mitosis detection H&E Combines shapebased features with CNN Wang et al (2014) Mitosis detection H&E Cascaded ensemble of CNN and handcrafted features Ferrari et al (2015) Bacterial colony counting Culture plate CNN-based patch classifier Ronneberger et al (2015) Cell segmentation EM U-Net with deformation augmentation Shkolyar et al (2015) Mitosis detection Live-imaging CNN-based patch classifier Song et al (2015) Segmentation of cytoplasm and nuclei H&E Multi-scale CNN and graph-partitioning-based method Xie et al (2015a) Nucleus detection Ki-67 CNN model that learns the voting offset vectors and voting confidence Xie et al (2015b) Nucleus detection H&E, Ki-67 CNN-based structured regression model for cell detection Akram et al (2016) Cell segmentation FL, PC, H&E fCNN for cell bounding box proposal and CNN for segmentation Albarqouni et al (2016) Mitosis detection H&E Incorporated 'crowd sourcing' layer into the CNN framework Bauer et al (2016) Nucleus classification IHC CNN-based patch classifier Chen et al (2016b) Mitosis detection H&E Deep regression network (DRN) Gao et al (2016e) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Han et al (2016) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Janowczyk et al (2016b) Nucleus segmentation H&E Resolution adaptive deep hierarchical learning scheme Kashif et al (2016) Nucleus detection H&E Combination of CNN and hand-crafted features Mao and Yin (2016) Mitosis detection PC Hierarchical CNNs for patch sequence classification Mishra et al (2016) Classification of mitochondria EM CNN-based patch classifier Phan et al (2016) Nucleus classification FL Classification of Hep2-cells using transfer learning (pre-trained CNN) Romo-Bucheli et al (2016) Tubule nuclei detection H&E CNN-based classification of pre-selected candidate nuclei Sirinukunwattana et al (2016) Nucleus detection and classification H&E CNN with spatially constrained regression Song et al (2017) Cell segmentation H&E Multi-scale C...…”
Section: Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many works add features derived from deep networks to existing feature sets or compare (2013) Detection of basal cell carcinoma H&E Convolutional auto-encoder neural network Malon and Cosatto (2013) Mitosis detection H&E Combines shapebased features with CNN Wang et al (2014) Mitosis detection H&E Cascaded ensemble of CNN and handcrafted features Ferrari et al (2015) Bacterial colony counting Culture plate CNN-based patch classifier Ronneberger et al (2015) Cell segmentation EM U-Net with deformation augmentation Shkolyar et al (2015) Mitosis detection Live-imaging CNN-based patch classifier Song et al (2015) Segmentation of cytoplasm and nuclei H&E Multi-scale CNN and graph-partitioning-based method Xie et al (2015a) Nucleus detection Ki-67 CNN model that learns the voting offset vectors and voting confidence Xie et al (2015b) Nucleus detection H&E, Ki-67 CNN-based structured regression model for cell detection Akram et al (2016) Cell segmentation FL, PC, H&E fCNN for cell bounding box proposal and CNN for segmentation Albarqouni et al (2016) Mitosis detection H&E Incorporated 'crowd sourcing' layer into the CNN framework Bauer et al (2016) Nucleus classification IHC CNN-based patch classifier Chen et al (2016b) Mitosis detection H&E Deep regression network (DRN) Gao et al (2016e) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Han et al (2016) Nucleus classification IFL Classification of Hep2-cells with CNN Janowczyk et al (2016b) Nucleus segmentation H&E Resolution adaptive deep hierarchical learning scheme Kashif et al (2016) Nucleus detection H&E Combination of CNN and hand-crafted features Mao and Yin (2016) Mitosis detection PC Hierarchical CNNs for patch sequence classification Mishra et al (2016) Classification of mitochondria EM CNN-based patch classifier Phan et al (2016) Nucleus classification FL Classification of Hep2-cells using transfer learning (pre-trained CNN) Romo-Bucheli et al (2016) Tubule nuclei detection H&E CNN-based classification of pre-selected candidate nuclei Sirinukunwattana et al (2016) Nucleus detection and classification H&E CNN with spatially constrained regression Song et al (2017) Cell segmentation H&E Multi-scale C...…”
Section: Chestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weighted F1 Score Our CNN 0.775 Softmax CNN+SSPP [5] 0.748 Superpixel Descriptor [6] 0.687 CRImage [7] 0.488 Table 1. Comparative results for nucleus classification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weighted average F1 score for our network is 0.7749 which is higher than the previous published works as shown in Table 1. Our model converges to minimum error in 30 epochs while the network in [5] converges in 120 epochs. Our weighted precision and recall are 0.7739 and 0.7759, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies have relied upon popular microscopy image analysis software, such as CellProfiler, 12 to perform image feature extraction, 13 but the commonly used available algorithms fail to generalize adequately to the significant variation of most large-scale histopathological image data sets. Recently, several methods for nuclear detection and segmentation have been developed using deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), [14][15][16][17] which have shown improvements over traditional methods. For our framework, we developed our own patch-based CNN for nuclear segmentation, which we optimized for computational efficiency and trained using additional image data from TCGA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%