2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2012.6248107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locality-constrained and spatially regularized coding for scene categorization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ScSPM performs better than both linear SPM kernel (LSPM) on histograms and traditional nonlinear SPM kernels with linear SVM (LSVM) because the pooling of sparse codes quantizes only the essential features which is linearly separable by SVM. However, ScSPM solves L1-norm optimization problem which is computationally expensive [61]. Moreover, it is non-consistent to encode similar descriptors [61,62].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…ScSPM performs better than both linear SPM kernel (LSPM) on histograms and traditional nonlinear SPM kernels with linear SVM (LSVM) because the pooling of sparse codes quantizes only the essential features which is linearly separable by SVM. However, ScSPM solves L1-norm optimization problem which is computationally expensive [61]. Moreover, it is non-consistent to encode similar descriptors [61,62].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is non-consistent to encode similar descriptors [61,62]. Several modifications have been proposed for these problems [61][62][63]. For instance, Wang et al propose a modification of ScSPM by considering locality constraints in linear coding (LLC) to project each descriptor into its local-coordinate system where projected coordinates are amalgamated by MP [62].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations