Locality and localism: a view from British Human Geography

Abstract

This paper considers the political geography of localism and reviews the insights of geographers regarding localism and locality. It identifies three main approaches to locality in Human Geography. Regional geographers, humanistic geographers and spatial scientists view localities as relatively natural phenomena. Marxist and political-economic geographers view localities as social phenomena produced by uneven capitalist development. Poststructuralist geographers view localities as characteristically open, plural and dynamic. The paper also distinguishes three sets of political localism to be found in human-geographical literatures. Firstly, localism describes seemingly natural ways of life -organised to maximise authentic experiences of place in the case of Humanistic Geography, and to minimise the friction of distance in the case of spatial science. Secondly, localism describes cultural-political expressions of spatial divisions of labour, including local political cultures, local proactivity in the context of large-scale economic restructuring, and actually existing, variegated, local neoliberalisations. Thirdly, localism describes struggles to produce locallyscaled action, including projects of local autonomy and self-sufficiency directed against the central state, movements to defend collective consumption from developers, coalitions to defend fixed capital against devaluation, and state-downscaling to regulate capitalism. To illustrate their usefulness, some of these insights are applied to the localism agendas of recent British governments.

Why women’s domestic violence refuges are not local services

“…Current austerity measures in the United Kingdom include shifting central/local government relationships via a new ‘Localism’ which talks of local councils having more power to meet the needs of local people (DCLG, 2010, 2011). Whilst there is a long history of localism agendas (Clarke, 2013; Evans et al, 2013a, 2013b, 2013c), this current version combines a rhetoric of devolution of power to local government with significant cuts to local government funding (Clarke and Cochrane, 2013). This article examines the implications of this localism agenda for women and children who need to relocate due to domestic violence.…”

Living with urban floods in Metro Manila: a gender approach to mobilities, work and climatic events

“…In human-geographical literature, 'locality' tends to be defined in terms of epistemologies: for instance, the Marxist view sees it as a place-specific social phenomenon created by uneven capitalist development, whilst according to post-structuralists, localities are open, plural and dynamic (Clarke, 2013). The commonalities between different definitions of a locality are that they are of a sub-national scale, different from place and mostly humanmade; they do not have well-defined boundaries.…”

(Re)Locating Community in Relationships: Questions for Public Policy

“…In a bid to reject spatial fetishism, and in the wake of a widespread adoption of Marxism and ontologies of networks, places have been understood in relation to other places, rather than being significant in their own right. As Clarke (2013: 499) puts it in a review of this field, local communities are now ‘seen as open, porous, permeable, heterogeneous, incoherent, dynamic and incomplete; products of mixture, encounter, intermingling; characterised by juxtapositions and co-presences; sites of distanciated connections; marked by other times and places and implicated in numerous networks’. Representing this view, Amin and Thrift (2002: 4) have called on human geographers to move beyond ‘a politics based on nostalgia for a lost past of tightly knit and spatially compact urban communities’.…”