2018
DOI: 10.18415/ijmmu.v5i3.141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Wisdom of Kasepuhan Ciptagelar: The Development of Social Solidarity in The Era of Globalization

Abstract: Kasepuhan Ciptagelar is one of the Sundanese traditional village based on agricultural culture in West Java Province, Indonesia. Kasepuhan Ciptagelar people still hold and apply their ancestral cultural values in their daily life. The purpose of this study is to (1) know the existence of local wisdom values that exist in Kasepuhan Ciptagelar society; (2) to know the form of social solidarity values that exist in Kasepuhan Ciptagelar community and (3) Integration of local wisdom value for social solidarity deve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also reinforces the existing aspects of local wisdom in Bone County, according to [11] that local wisdom can be understood as wise, wise, good-value, and virtuous ideas and local knowledge. Local wisdom can be obtained from cultural customs or oral customs that are hereditary inherited and utilized in improving the life of a society.…”
Section: Obstacles In the Protection Of Human Rights Of Women In Bsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It also reinforces the existing aspects of local wisdom in Bone County, according to [11] that local wisdom can be understood as wise, wise, good-value, and virtuous ideas and local knowledge. Local wisdom can be obtained from cultural customs or oral customs that are hereditary inherited and utilized in improving the life of a society.…”
Section: Obstacles In the Protection Of Human Rights Of Women In Bsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This study classifies the Sundanese Indigenous people concerning some characteristics of local wisdom: Upholding respect (respecting one another, not only for Indigenous people), showing independence (not too dependent on others), showing high solidarity ( having a strong sense of kinship), standing strong (having strong principles), being open (accepting new things positively), having integrity (maintaining consistency between words and deeds) and encouraging participation (providing mutual cooperation in all development). The description of the people's characteristics still upholds local wisdom in responding to globalization, namely social solidarity, environmental awareness, honesty, democracy, creativity, and responsibility [33]. Meanwhile, it seems that the positive attitude of accepting globalization that integrates harmony with Sundanese local wisdom was discovered.…”
Section: Description Of Sundanese Local Wisdom That Can Harmonize Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study in Kasepuhan Ciptagelar describes local wisdom as social solidarity, environmental awareness, democracy, honesty, responsibility, and creativity. Local wisdom is considered as a guide to maintaining their survival in the globalized era [33]. A study in Kalibiru, Lopati Yogyakarta, shows that local wisdom prioritizes mutual cooperation among their communities, combined with innovation and motivation to develop a tourism village.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indonesia is well-known for its cultural diversity and its traditions. This noble culture and tradition come from hundreds of tribes that inhabit the archipelago (Ramadhan, Djono & Suryani, 2018). Therefore, the social life and culture that develops in an area will certainly be influenced by a lot of matters, both those that support and hindered it's the development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously there were several studies that have been carried out. The research carried out by Ramadhan, Djono & Suryani (2018) explains the pattern of dualism or sakuren in the social organization system of Kasepuhan Ciptagelar community. The issues that distinguish between research that has been carried out by Ramadhan, Djono & Suryani (2018) and Kusdiwanggo & Jakob Sumardjo (2016) with this research is in terms of the content and subject discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%