2003
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local versus Global Assessment of Mobility*

Abstract: Mobility indices are popular tools designed to quantify the extent of income changes by aggregating “local” distributional change into a “global” scalar according to some rule. For some mobility measures, this aggregation rule is only implicit in their standard definition. We derive an insightful approximation to the (statistical) aggregation rule for the important class of mobility indices introduced by Shorrocks (Journal of Economic Theory 19 (1978), 376–93) and further generalized by Maasoumi and Zandvakili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See for example Nickell (1997). On this basis one might expect that earnings mobility among persons not changing jobs to be greater in Britain than Germany, but this may not be so: it is now well-established that Germany has higher earnings mobility than the USA (Burkhauser et al, 1998;Schluter and Trede, 1999).…”
Section: Differences In the Prevalence Of Labour Market And Demographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for example Nickell (1997). On this basis one might expect that earnings mobility among persons not changing jobs to be greater in Britain than Germany, but this may not be so: it is now well-established that Germany has higher earnings mobility than the USA (Burkhauser et al, 1998;Schluter and Trede, 1999).…”
Section: Differences In the Prevalence Of Labour Market And Demographmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Kerm (2004) compares Belgium, Western Germany and the United States. Buchinsky et al (2003), Fields (2010), Cohen (1999) and Cohen and Dupas (2000) study France and the United States. Italy and the United States are compared by Flinn (2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar spirit, Schluter and Trede (2003) find that income mobility is larger in Germany than in the United States, because higher mobility in the bottom of the distribution in Germany is combined with an implicitly higher weighting by the mobility index at the bottom (inequality indices by construction do not give the same weight to the entire income spectrum).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%