Local tomography model of the northeastern Black Sea: intra-plate crustal underthrusting

Abstract

The Greater Caucasus and southern Crimean Mountains form part of a fold–thrust belt located on the northern margin of the Black Sea, south of the Precambrian craton of eastern Europe. Its southern limit is approximated by the Main Caucasus Thrust, which runs to the west from onshore Russia and Georgia along the whole of the northern margin of the Black Sea. The Main Caucasus Thrust is related to a zone of present-day seismicity along the southern Crimea–Caucasus coast of the Black Sea called the Crimea–Caucasus Seismic Zone. Thick continental crust north of the Main Caucasus Thrust lies adjacent to the thin ‘suboceanic' or transitional crust of the Black Sea Basin. A local seismic tomography study of this area in the vicinity of the Kerch and Taman peninsulas, which lie between the Azov Sea and the Black Sea, has been carried out based on 195 weak (mb≤3) earthquakes occurring from 1975 to 2010 and recorded at four permanent and three temporary seismological stations on the Kerch and Taman peninsulas. The results, for a volume of about 200×100 km (east–west and north–south, respectively) and a depth of about 40 km, provide evidence for significant heterogeneity in the P-wave and S-wave velocities. Velocities inferred in the northern part of the model suggest that the continental crust underlying the Crimea–Azov region north of the Main Caucasus Thrust is of different tectonic affinity (cratonic) than that underlying the northeastern part of the Black Sea, south of the Main Caucasus Thrust (Neoproterozoic–Palaeozoic accretionary domain). In the southern part of the model, at depths of 25–40 km, the uppermost mantle below the thin quasi-oceanic crust of the Black Sea has anomalous low P-wave velocities with high P- to S-wave velocity ratios. This is tentatively interpreted as representing serpentinized upper mantle of continental lithosphere exhumed during Cretaceous rifting and lithospheric hyperextension of the eastern Black Sea. The transition between the continental domains and the crust underlain by anomalous upper mantle is closely related to the Crimea–Caucasus Seismic Zone, where earthquake foci deepen northwards, suggesting that the latter is being thrust under the former in this intra-plate setting.

Tectonic Evolution of the Eastern Black Sea and Caucasus: an introduction

“…A local seismic tomography study of this same area centred on the Kerch Peninsula and reported by Gobarenko et al (2015) complements the Starostenko et al (2016) geophysical study. The resulting three-dimensional P-and S-wave velocity models, for an area of c. 200 × 100 km (east-west and north-south, respectively) with a depth of c. 40 km ( Fig.…”

“…Cavazza et al (2015) suggest a final (and contemporaneous) phase of the Arabia -Eurasia collisional process to have started in the Miocene, mainly expressed today as the active Anatolian Fault/westwards extrusion of Anatolia. Gobarenko et al (2015) infer, however, that contemporary earthquakes on the northern margin of the eastern Black Sea provide evidence for continued underthrusting of Black Sea crust and lithosphere beneath the Crimean (Kerch) and Taman peninsulas. They also suggest from their local tomography velocity models that the underthrust Black Sea is not of oceanic affinity.…”

“…1; area 9), suggest that the continental crust underlying the Crimea -Azov region north of the Black Sea margin is of different, cratonic, tectonic affinity than that underlying the northeastern part of the Black Sea. The uppermost mantle below the thin quasi-oceanic crust of the eastern Black Sea deep basin has been tentatively interpreted by Gobarenko et al (2015) as representing serpentinized upper mantle of continental lithosphere exhumed during Cretaceous rifting and lithospheric hyperextension of the eastern Black Sea. The Crimea -Caucasus seismic zone, where earthquake foci deepen northwards, lies between the continental domains to the north and the crust underlain by anomalous upper mantle, suggesting that the latter is being thrust under the former in this intra-plate setting.…”

Lithospheric structure based on integrated analysis of geological-geophysical data along the DOBREfraction’99/DOBRE-2 profile (the East European Platform —the East Black Sea Basin)

“…Была опре 100 делена структура земной коры, включая рельеф поверхности Мохо [Москаленко, Маловицкий, 1974]. Через 36 лет были опуб ликованы результаты переинтерпретации этих данных с использованием первичных сейсмограмм и годографов из старых от четов и публикаций с применением про цедуры трассирования лучей [Yegorova et al, 2017]. При этом в строении кристалли ческой коры не было установлено прин ципиальных различий от оригинальных ре зультатов, полученных ручным способом [Starostenko et al, 2010].…”

“…В Азовском море не достигнуто консен суса относительно границы Восточно-Ев ропейской платформы (ВЕП) и Скифской плиты (СП), возраста кристаллического фундамента СП и тектонического р ай о нирования. В северо-восточной части ВЧВ тип коры определен неоднозначно Gobarenko et al, 2017].…”