2013
DOI: 10.1190/geo2012-0252.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local time stepping with the discontinuous Galerkin method for wave propagation in 3D heterogeneous media

Abstract: Modeling and imaging techniques for geophysics are extremely demanding in terms of computational resources. Seismic data attempt to resolve smaller scales and deeper targets in increasingly more complex geologic settings. Finite elements enable accurate simulation of time-dependent wave propagation in heterogeneous media. They are more costly than finite-difference methods, but this is compensated by their superior accuracy if the finite-element mesh follows the sharp impedance contrasts and by their improved … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The previously defined algorithm does not make explicit considerations for an efficient implementation with continuous finite elements that can achieve the LTS speedup predicted by (28).…”
Section: Lts-newmark Formulation For a Continuous Femmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The previously defined algorithm does not make explicit considerations for an efficient implementation with continuous finite elements that can achieve the LTS speedup predicted by (28).…”
Section: Lts-newmark Formulation For a Continuous Femmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further work using a DG method done by Gödel et al [13] was able to show an LTS algorithm working on GPUs for Maxwell's equations. The LTS-leap-frog method proposed by [7] was implemented by [28] using a DG discretization for applications in seismic wave propagation. We note that all of these successful, high-performance implementations of LTS for wave propagation applications have utilized a DG discretization, which may not always be desired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DG approach does not suffer from these limitations, but it is generally considered as expensive because of the excessively large number of degrees of freedom. In contrast with other methods, DG schemes are easily combined with local time-stepping strategies in order to improve computational efficiency and speed up of geophysical wave propagation [Baldassari et al, 2011, Dumbser and Käser, 2009, Minisini et al, 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we summarize methods of direct time integration suitable for usage in dynamic FE computations [13]: explicit methods [2,3,5,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], implicit methods [32][33][34][35][36][37][38], implicit-explicit methods [39][40][41], multi-time step and time sub-cycling methods [31,42,43], heterogeneous and asynchronous time integrators [44][45][46], variational time integrators [47,48], various local stepping approaches in time [49][50][51][52][53], time schemes for higher-order FEM and isogeometric analysis [2,54], and methods based on binary partitioning using a variable time step size…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%