Abstract:Abstract. Support functions and samples of convex bodies in R ~ are studied with regard to conditions for their validity or consistency. Necessary and sufficient conditions for a function to be a support function are reviewed in a general setting. An apparently little known classical such result for the planar case due to Rademacher and based on a determinantal inequality is presented and a generalization to, arbitrary dimensions is developed. These conditions are global in the sense that they involve values o… Show more
“…However, in more complicated settings, verification of (9) can be computationally burdensome. Karl et al (1995) demonstrate that condition (9) needs to be verified only for (S + 1)−tuples of vectors y i 1 , . .…”
Section: Approximation With Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karl et al (1995) provide necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of support function measurements. Some new terminology is necessary.…”
“…However, in more complicated settings, verification of (9) can be computationally burdensome. Karl et al (1995) demonstrate that condition (9) needs to be verified only for (S + 1)−tuples of vectors y i 1 , . .…”
Section: Approximation With Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Karl et al (1995) provide necessary and sufficient conditions for consistency of support function measurements. Some new terminology is necessary.…”
“…This section provides a customized summary of the theory of support functions for the case of 3D based on the paper by Karl et al (1995). Our emphasis is on providing an intuitive description of properties and their use in the context of projection reconstruction.…”
Section: Theory Of Support Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An algorithm for estimating 2D support functions was developed by Prince and Willsky (1990) with implementations reported by Lele et al (1992) for a laser-radar application and by Huff (1997, 1998) in the context of PET. Karl et al (1995) extended the theory to arbitrary dimensions but did not translate their results into an algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first of its kind to address the problem of actually estimating a 3D support function, albeit for a fairly restricted geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We describe how to obtain projection data from k-space as well as how to set up the imaging equations needed for an algebraic reconstruction. Section III provides an introduction to the theory of support functions based on the paper by Karl et al (1995) together with a description of our algorithm for setting up the tests needed for making an inconsistent support function estimate consistent. We also show how to apply duality theory (Bertsekas and Tsitsiklis, 1989) to turn the associated optimization problem into a simple nonnegative least squares problem.…”
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of nuclei that have very short relaxation times is conveniently based on spherical sampling. We have presented a least squares framework for reconstructing three-dimensional (3D) source distribution images from such data. In this paper, we describe a practical algorithm for 3D support function estimation, which forms the basis for a method called focus of attention. By essentially identifying and eliminating equations and unknowns that merely represent background data, this data-driven preprocessing scheme effectively reduces the computational burden associated with our algebraic approach to projection MRI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.