2012
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2012.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local temperature perturbations of the boundary layer in the regime of free viscous–inviscid interaction

Abstract: We analyse the disturbed flow in the subsonic laminar boundary layer, disturbances being generated by local heating elements, which are placed on the surface. It is exhibited that these flows are described in terms of free interaction theory for specific sizes of thermal sources. We construct the numerical solution for the case of a flat subsonic stream in the viscous asymptotic layer, in which the flow is described by nonlinear equations for vorticity, temperature and an interaction condition which provides t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between the present work and that of Koroteev & Lipatov (2012), Koroteev & Lipatov (2013) is that H(x b ) = 0 in the latter.…”
Section: Problem Formulationcontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between the present work and that of Koroteev & Lipatov (2012), Koroteev & Lipatov (2013) is that H(x b ) = 0 in the latter.…”
Section: Problem Formulationcontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The wall-shear distribution in figure 2b decreases initially but there is a sharp rise and drop on entering and leaving the heated region. The discontinuous changes forh = 0 at the start and end of the heated region are also seen in the results of Koroteev & Lipatov (2012). The main difference between the flat plate case withh = 0 and the hump shape is that the presence of the hump creates a larger pressure drop and much larger rise in the wall shear stress across the heated part as compared to the flat plate case.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations