2003
DOI: 10.1086/379138
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Surface Density of the Galactic Disk from a Three-Dimensional Stellar Velocity Sample

Abstract: We have re-estimated the surface density of the Galactic disk in the solar neighborhood within ± 0.4 kpc of the Sun using parallaxes and proper motions of a kinematically and spatially unbiased sample of 1476 old bright red giant stars from the Hipparcos catalog with measured radial velocities from Barbier-Brossat & Figon (2000). We determine the vertical distribution of the red giants as well as the vertical velocity dispersion of the sample, (14.4 ± 0.3 km/sec), and combine these to derive the surface densit… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
82
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
14
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…−2 in agreement with the Korchagin et al (2003) determination 42 ± 6 M pc −2 , based on a sample of 1500 K giants from H observations, mainly first ascent giants rather than clump giants.…”
Section: The K Z Forcesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…−2 in agreement with the Korchagin et al (2003) determination 42 ± 6 M pc −2 , based on a sample of 1500 K giants from H observations, mainly first ascent giants rather than clump giants.…”
Section: The K Z Forcesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Depending on which local stellar volume mass density was assumed for the thin disc, the total dynamical mass density slightly changes. However, by taking into account the error bars, both values are in a good agreement with the results of Holmberg & Flynn (2000) and Korchagin et al (2003). Undoubtedly, the derived values are highly dependent on the density assumed for the ISM (see Sect.…”
Section: The Dynamical Mass and The Age-velocity Relationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The estimation of the local dynamical mass density by Crézé et al (1998) was 0.076 ± 0.015 M pc −3 . Holmberg & Flynn (2000) derives it to be 0.102 ± 0.010 M pc −3 and similarly Korchagin et al (2003) gives 0.100 M pc −3 , while van Leeuwen (2007) proposes a bit higher value 0.122 ± 0.019 M pc −3 . Table 7 presents the contribution of all mass components to the total dynamical mass Notes.…”
Section: The Dynamical Mass and The Age-velocity Relationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The local mass density was recently revised by van Leeuwen (2007) by using a re-reduction of the Hipparcos catalogue. In contrast to Crézé et al (1998) Korchagin et al (2003) of 0.100 M pc −3 are considered as the reference value. To match this value, we corrected the interstellar matter mass density and attributed to it 0.05 M pc −3 , in agreement with Binney & Tremaine (2008) and still within the error bars given by observational constraints.…”
Section: Thin-disc Local Density and Dynamical Self-consistencymentioning
confidence: 97%