1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.11197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local suppression of Josephson currents in niobium/two-dimensional electron gas/niobium structures by an injection current

Abstract: We investigated niobium-AlGaSb/InAs-niobium hybrid structures using a high mobility two-dimensional electron gas as a weak link. The Josephson current observed in this structure was suppressed by an injection current driven into the weak link via an additional normal lead. Using a four-terminal configuration the supercurrent is suppressed all over the weak link. In a three-terminal configuration it was possible to suppress the supercurrent locally. ͓S0163-1829͑99͒06217-7͔The semiconductor/superconductor hybrid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In controllable Josephson junctions, the supercurrent is modulated by driving the quasiparticle distribution out of equilibrium ͑van Wees et al, 1991;Volkov, 1995;Volkov and Pavlovskii, 1996;Volkov and Takayanagi, 1997;Wilhelm et al, 1998;Yip, 1998;Seviour and Volkov, 2000a;Heikkilä et al, 2002͒ via dissipative current injection in the weak link from additional normal-metal terminals. This operation principle leads to a controlled supercurrent suppression and was successfully exploited in both all-metal ͑Morpurgo et Baselmans et al, 1999Baselmans et al, , 2001aBaselmans et al, , 2001bShaikhaidarov et al, 2000;Baselmans, Heikkilä, et al, 2002;Huang et al, 2002͒ ͑where a transition to a state was also reported͒ as well as in hybrid semiconductor-superconductor weak links ͑Schäpers et Kutchinsky et al, 1999;Neurohr et al, 1999;Richter, 2000;Schäpers, Guzenko, et al, 2003;. The situation drastically changes if we allow current injection from additional superconducting terminals arranged in a SINIS fashion ͑Baselmans, 2002; Giazotto, Taddei, et al, 2003;Giazotto et al, 2004a.…”
Section: Josephson Transistorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In controllable Josephson junctions, the supercurrent is modulated by driving the quasiparticle distribution out of equilibrium ͑van Wees et al, 1991;Volkov, 1995;Volkov and Pavlovskii, 1996;Volkov and Takayanagi, 1997;Wilhelm et al, 1998;Yip, 1998;Seviour and Volkov, 2000a;Heikkilä et al, 2002͒ via dissipative current injection in the weak link from additional normal-metal terminals. This operation principle leads to a controlled supercurrent suppression and was successfully exploited in both all-metal ͑Morpurgo et Baselmans et al, 1999Baselmans et al, , 2001aBaselmans et al, , 2001bShaikhaidarov et al, 2000;Baselmans, Heikkilä, et al, 2002;Huang et al, 2002͒ ͑where a transition to a state was also reported͒ as well as in hybrid semiconductor-superconductor weak links ͑Schäpers et Kutchinsky et al, 1999;Neurohr et al, 1999;Richter, 2000;Schäpers, Guzenko, et al, 2003;. The situation drastically changes if we allow current injection from additional superconducting terminals arranged in a SINIS fashion ͑Baselmans, 2002; Giazotto, Taddei, et al, 2003;Giazotto et al, 2004a.…”
Section: Josephson Transistorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical origin of the SF cooler operation stems from the spin-band splitting characteristic of a ferromagnet. The electron involved in the Andreev reflection and its phase-matched 4 See, for example, Kastalsky et al, 1991;Nguyen et al, 1992;van Wees et al, 1992;Xiong et al, 1993;Bakker et al, 1994;Magnée et al, 1994;Nitta et al, 1994;Kutchinsky et al, 1997;Poirier et al, 1997;Badolato et al, 2000;Giazotto, Cecchini, et al, 2001;Giazotto, Pingue, et al, 2003;2001. FIG.…”
Section: Sf Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that all transverse modes couple equally to the modes in the injection point contact. [12] Boundary conditions are incoming electron and hole quasiparticles from the normal reservoir and incoming electron-and hole-like quasiparticles from the superconductors at energies above the gap. Knowing the wave function coefficients the current density is straightforwardly calculated.…”
Section: Model and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 In most experimental situations the distribution function will be in between both extreme limits. 2,3 In this report we discuss the carrier injection into a ballistic superconductor/two-dimensional electron gas multiterminal junction. The 2DEG is located in a strained InGaAs/ InP layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, control of a supercurrent was also observed in ballistic junctions with a high mobility twodimensional electron gas ͑2DEG͒ as an N layer. [2][3][4] Control of a supercurrent by coupling a normal reservoir via a constriction to a ballistic SNS junction was first proposed by van Wees et al 5 Further theoretical studies on ballistic nonequilibrium junctions dealt with the anomalous dc Josephson current, 6,7 four-terminal junctions, 8,9,7 and Andreev level spectroscopy. 10 The current injection into a diffusive junction was first discussed by Volkov.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%