2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local structure study of the Ni nanoparticles embedded in SiO2 by ion implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The metal–oxygen bond distances were R Ni–O = 2.030 ± 0.009 Å and R Co–O = 2.035 ± 0.016 Å for the 7.5Co–7.5Ni catalyst and R Co–O = 2.047 ± 0.008 Å for the 15Co catalyst. Second shell metal–metal scattering characteristic of CoO or NiO structures was not observed, while the metal–oxygen scattering bond distances were significantly shorter than for the corresponding bulk species ( R Co–O = 2.095 ± 0.008 Å; R Ni–O = 2.080 ± 0.006 Å). These lower metal–oxygen bond distances, together with no significant presence of metal–metal (M–M) scattering derived from the oxide component, suggested the interaction of oxygen with the metal nanoparticle surfaces. , The M–M coordination numbers for the 7.5Co7.5Ni catalyst, obtained at the Co and Ni K-edges, could be considered to be in the same range, with a Co–Co bond distance ( R Co–Co ) of 2.499 ± 0.001 Å and a Ni–Ni bond distance ( R Ni–Ni ) of 2.488 ± 0.002 Å. These bond distances obtained for the 7.5Co7.5Ni bimetallic catalyst were lower than for the 15Co catalyst ( R Co–Co = 2.509 ± 0.001 Å) but were similar to those found for the monometallic 15Ni sample ( R Ni–Ni = 2.488 ± 0.003 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The metal–oxygen bond distances were R Ni–O = 2.030 ± 0.009 Å and R Co–O = 2.035 ± 0.016 Å for the 7.5Co–7.5Ni catalyst and R Co–O = 2.047 ± 0.008 Å for the 15Co catalyst. Second shell metal–metal scattering characteristic of CoO or NiO structures was not observed, while the metal–oxygen scattering bond distances were significantly shorter than for the corresponding bulk species ( R Co–O = 2.095 ± 0.008 Å; R Ni–O = 2.080 ± 0.006 Å). These lower metal–oxygen bond distances, together with no significant presence of metal–metal (M–M) scattering derived from the oxide component, suggested the interaction of oxygen with the metal nanoparticle surfaces. , The M–M coordination numbers for the 7.5Co7.5Ni catalyst, obtained at the Co and Ni K-edges, could be considered to be in the same range, with a Co–Co bond distance ( R Co–Co ) of 2.499 ± 0.001 Å and a Ni–Ni bond distance ( R Ni–Ni ) of 2.488 ± 0.002 Å. These bond distances obtained for the 7.5Co7.5Ni bimetallic catalyst were lower than for the 15Co catalyst ( R Co–Co = 2.509 ± 0.001 Å) but were similar to those found for the monometallic 15Ni sample ( R Ni–Ni = 2.488 ± 0.003 Å).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Compared to other techniques, such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [5], molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) [6], sol-gel synthesis [7] and pulsed laser deposition [8], ion implantation has several important advantages, including no synthesis-related impurities and precise control of the introduced metal ions and their depth distribution in the dielectric matrix [9]. Accordingly, nanoparticles of metals and metal oxides, such as copper (Cu) [10], gold (Au), nickel (Ni) [11], silver (Ag) [12], cobalt (Co) [13], etc., were synthesized by ion implantation in dielectrics such as SiO 2 [14], Al 2 O 3 [15], and even in MgO [16,17] or CeO 2 [13]. According to the literature sources, in the SiO 2 matrix, the implanted ions form spherical nanoparticles with a random distribution [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%