2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2011.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local structure of the Ce3+ ion in the yellow emitting phosphor YAG:Ce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes it a versatile tool to study persistent luminescent materials since the dopant concentration will usually be very low. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it a versatile tool to study persistent luminescent materials since the dopant concentration will usually be very low. [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 F 7/2 (7) transition, that leads to the apparent two band emission shape for main center emission of Ce 3+ in garnets, has been explained in terms of higher symmetry of the crystal field; the crystal field in garnets being of the order of spin-orbit $2000 cm À1 [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The assumed higher symmetry of the vicinity of Ce 3+ in YAG is sustained by EXAFS data [27]. Since Ce 3+ has in 8-fold coordination larger ionic radius compared to Y 3+ [28], in Ce:YAG crystal a significant expansion of the distorted cubic local structure (limited to the nearest neighbors coordination O 2À sphere) takes place.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…15]. In effect, in the case of the Ce Y single substitutional defect, wave function based ab initio embedded-cluster calculations on the states of the 4f 1 and 5d 1 configurations (completeactive-space self-consistent-field [16][17][18] based second-order many-body perturbation theory [19][20][21][22] CASSCF/CASPT2) predicted its ground structure (later seen to agree reasonably well with EXAFS measurements 23 ) and excited state structures, and computed its absorption and emission spectra, which helped solving remaining assignment issues 24 . In the cases of Ga 3+…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%