2014
DOI: 10.1109/mmul.2014.51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Stereo Matching with Improved Matching Cost and Disparity Refinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the proposed stereo matching method achieves better disparity estimation quality than the methods proposed in [15,18,21] and [27] in Middlebury datasets, especially in the normal stereo datasets. For non-ideal conditions in light, large disparity, and angle moving stereo datasets, the proposed and the other methods have the same tendency in these datasets.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, the proposed stereo matching method achieves better disparity estimation quality than the methods proposed in [15,18,21] and [27] in Middlebury datasets, especially in the normal stereo datasets. For non-ideal conditions in light, large disparity, and angle moving stereo datasets, the proposed and the other methods have the same tendency in these datasets.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In this subsection, we compare the proposed system to four related methods, which are census-based semiglobal stereo matching [21], cross-based local stereo matching [15], combined cost-based local stereo matching [27], and belief propagation-based global stereo matching [18]. In Fig.…”
Section: Performance Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when the image radiometric condition is good, the absolute difference (AD), the insensitive measure of Birchfield and Tomasi (BT), or the gradient measure can achieve accurate matching results (Meiet et al, 2011). When the image radiation varies, zero-based normalized cross correlation (ZNCC) and normalized gradient (Zhou and Boulanger, 2012) are often used to compensate for linear radiation distortions between correspondences, while Census (Zabih and Woodfill, 2005;Jiao et al, 2014;Kordelas et al, 2015), mutual information (Paul et al, 1997), and image radiation correction (Jung et al, 2013) are insensitive to nonlinear radiation distortion. Hirschmuller evaluated the popular cost computation methods and concluded that Census and mutual information measures can achieve the best matching results under varying radiometric conditions (Hirschmueller and Scharstein, 2009).…”
Section: Review Of Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The -L‖ component of the lab color space closely matches for the easy human perception. There are many image processing algorithms applying the important transformations discussed in [1] [9]; we convert the left and right images from RGB to the Lab color space and retain only the L values of its pixels for further processing. The color space xyz conversion is also used for result comparison with the lab color space.…”
Section: A Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%