2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00371-016-1264-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local stereo matching algorithm with efficient matching cost and adaptive guided image filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 shows the left image of the aloe data under three different illuminations (no exposure variation) and with three different exposure settings (no illumination change). In this paper, three widely used cost computation methods were considered for comparison, including a function combining the sum of absolute difference (SAD) and gradient [6], a function combining absolute difference (AD) with census transform [14] and a combination of absolute difference, gradient, and Census transform [15]. To highlight the preference of cost computation function, all disparity maps were computed with the same cost aggregation algorithm proposed in Section 2.2 and no further refinement was applied.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Robustness To The Illumination And Exposurmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 7 shows the left image of the aloe data under three different illuminations (no exposure variation) and with three different exposure settings (no illumination change). In this paper, three widely used cost computation methods were considered for comparison, including a function combining the sum of absolute difference (SAD) and gradient [6], a function combining absolute difference (AD) with census transform [14] and a combination of absolute difference, gradient, and Census transform [15]. To highlight the preference of cost computation function, all disparity maps were computed with the same cost aggregation algorithm proposed in Section 2.2 and no further refinement was applied.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Robustness To The Illumination And Exposurmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mei et al [14] combined the absolute differences and Census transform to achieve an impressive performance. In [15][16][17], a combination of absolute difference, gradient and census transform or the variant versions were used for initial cost computation. The combination of multiple matching costs provides an alternative way to improve the performance of stereo matching algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 3: Select the neighboring intraframe modes [24][25][26] by step 1 according to the modes in list L4 to constitute list L5={11, 13,15,17,19}. Calculate the SATD of each mode in list L5 in like manner, and select five modes with the smallest SATD from list L4 and list L5 to constitute list L6.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithm Based On Three-step Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, stereo matching algorithms can be divided into two categories: conventional algorithms and deep learningbased algorithms. Specifically, conventional stereo matching algorithms can be subdivided into global stereo matching [4], local stereo matching [5][6][7], and semi-global stereo matching [8]. The effect of global stereo matching depends on accuracy of matching cost, and the calculation process is very slow as the disparity is solved by global energy function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%