2002
DOI: 10.1080/0142569022000015472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local States of Emergency: The contradictions of neo-liberal governance in education in New Zealand

Abstract: In the present paper, we argue that neo-liberal governance regimes are deeply contradictory and that these contradictions are increasingly evident within the education sector. Drawing on a case study of the consequences of restructuring in education in New Zealand, arguably a paradigm case of neo-liberal governance, we suggest the state is faced with a dilemma about how best to manage these tensions and contradictions within the framework of the political rationality itself. One strategy is to isolate and loca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, social democratic partnerships have the potential to promote less hierarchical and more active decision-making and to promote economic innovation. On the other hand, neoliberal partnerships may be a way of addressing contradictions in governance by offering solutions to state and market failures and allowing the state to steer at a distance through local community networks (Jessop 2002;Robertson and Dale 2002). The context in which partnerships operate is therefore important.…”
Section: Partnerships and The Field Of Powermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, social democratic partnerships have the potential to promote less hierarchical and more active decision-making and to promote economic innovation. On the other hand, neoliberal partnerships may be a way of addressing contradictions in governance by offering solutions to state and market failures and allowing the state to steer at a distance through local community networks (Jessop 2002;Robertson and Dale 2002). The context in which partnerships operate is therefore important.…”
Section: Partnerships and The Field Of Powermentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Meanwhile, governments continue to leave important social responsibilities to the vagaries of the market while centralising power and control through funding and reporting mechanisms. When there is market failure the state is put in a contradictory position because it cannot be seen to support centralised solutions to market failure without undercutting neo-liberal ideology (Robertson & Dale, 2002). Instead, failure is presented in localised terms and addresses through 'emergency measures', like targeted case management of individuals, replacement of the principal of a failing school with another who has demonstrated success elsewhere.…”
Section: Neo-liberal Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper explores the political prehistory of NPM. Previous literature argues that only neoliberal ideas inspired NPM (Savoie 1994;Greenaway 1995;Rhodes 1996;Ventriss 2000;Ranson 2003;Marobela 2008;Leicht et al 2009;Bevir 2010;Boston 2010;de Vries 2010;Lorenz 2012;Guerrero-Orozco 2014); even in case studies of countries where left-wing or Social-Democratic governments have applied NPM reforms, scholars claim that neoliberal ideas have been highly significant causal forces (Mascarenhas 1993;Johnston 2000;Dale 2001;Robertson and Dale 2002;Lewis 2004). Keeping in mind that NPM is a set of market-oriented strategies for public-sector reform, it is perhaps not surprising that this assumption regarding the ideological roots of NPM has been made.…”
Section: Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%