Local states of chromatin compaction at transcription start sites control transcription levels

Abstract

The ‘open’ and ‘compact’ regions of chromatin are considered to be regions of active and silent transcription, respectively. However, individual genes produce transcripts at different levels, suggesting that transcription output does not depend on the simple open-compact conversion of chromatin, but on structural variations in chromatin itself, which so far have remained elusive. In this study, weakly crosslinked chromatin was subjected to sedimentation velocity centrifugation, which fractionated the chromatin according to its degree of compaction. Open chromatin remained in upper fractions, while compact chromatin sedimented to lower fractions depending on the level of nucleosome assembly. Although nucleosomes were evenly detected in all fractions, histone H1 was more highly enriched in the lower fractions. H1 was found to self-associate and crosslinked to histone H3, suggesting that H1 bound to H3 interacts with another H1 in an adjacent nucleosome to form compact chromatin. Genome-wide analyses revealed that nearly the entire genome consists of compact chromatin without differences in compaction between repeat and non-repeat sequences; however, active transcription start sites (TSSs) were rarely found in compact chromatin. Considering the inverse correlation between chromatin compaction and RNA polymerase binding at TSSs, it appears that local states of chromatin compaction determine transcription levels.

Escape From Oncogene-Induced Senescence is Controlled by POU2F2 and Memorized by Chromatin Scars

“…In contrast, time-matched control cells remained stable ( Figure S8A ). Interestingly, integrating chromatin accessibility dynamics with transcriptional modules revealed contributions of both opening and closing enhancers to the gene expression output, confirming the role of local chromatin state dynamics in determining gene expression levels 71 ( Figure S8B ). We next performed time-point pair-wise differential analysis to identify enhancer regions that permanently change accessibility as cells enter and escape from OIS.…”

Histone H1 binding to nucleosome arrays depends on linker DNA length and trajectory

“…We present cryo-EM structures of tetranucleosome arrays with different NRLs in the presence of the human linker histone H1 variant H1.4. The structures reveal a typical zig-zag arrangement of nucleosomes 23 – 26 , with a trinucleosome core consisting of two stacked nucleosomes 1 and 3 and a more flexible connecting nucleosome 2, suggesting that a trinucleosome may be a fundamental unit in chromatin 37 . The zig-zag arrangement is observed also in our 4×207 structure, in line with observations from in-cell mapping of DNA contacts 38 .…”

Epigenetic regulation and T-cell responses in endometriosis – something other than autoimmunity

“…This means that unlike "compact" chromatin within recombination-inert regions, chromatin at gene segments/loci undergoing V(D)J rearrangement fulfils the criteria of an "open" (noncompacted) configuration (60, 61). Referring to gene expression, the "compact" and "open" regions of chromatin are regions of silent and active transcription, respectively (62). When analyzing, for example, the Tcrb locus, a lightly packed form of chromatin, euchromatin, is linked both locally and in a stage-specific way with Db-to-Jb recombination events taking place with the assistance of germline transcription (GT), accessibility to restriction enzymes, enrichment in histone H3/H4 acetylation and H3K4 methylation, lack of CpG methylation, and diminished nucleosome abundance (54).…”

“…In the studies that involved insertion of a Db-Jb recombination substrate into the endogenous Vb14 gene segment, accessibility for recombination upon the inserted reporter remained dependent on epigenetically modulated chromatin conformation (64). The significance of this euchromatin-to-heterochromatin transition in health and disease is the subject of intense research aimed at identification of the combination of histone marks (e.g., H3K4ac, H3K4me) that possibly produce restriction at V(D)J rearranging loci (62,63,65). It is possible that active epigenetic marks are established through the recombining gene segments and associated RSs before AR V(D)J assembly by interaction with either sense or antisense GT (66,67).…”