5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1998) 1998
DOI: 10.21437/icslp.1998-545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local speech rate as a combination of syllable and phone rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample size of this study was determined on the previous studies about judging speech rate (Pfitzinger & Tamashima, 2006; Plug & Smith, 2021). In study by Pfitzinger and Tamashima (2006), with 20 participants in each group, they found effect sizes ( η 2 = .267 ∼ .324) for the main effects of different languages in the speech rate judgment task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sample size of this study was determined on the previous studies about judging speech rate (Pfitzinger & Tamashima, 2006; Plug & Smith, 2021). In study by Pfitzinger and Tamashima (2006), with 20 participants in each group, they found effect sizes ( η 2 = .267 ∼ .324) for the main effects of different languages in the speech rate judgment task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample size of this study was determined on the previous studies about judging speech rate (Pfitzinger & Tamashima, 2006; Plug & Smith, 2021). In study by Pfitzinger and Tamashima (2006), with 20 participants in each group, they found effect sizes ( η 2 = .267 ∼ .324) for the main effects of different languages in the speech rate judgment task. Another study (Plug & Smith, 2021) was recruited 34 participants and was found a robust effect size ( η 2 = .810) for judging speech rate when fixing the constituent duration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current presentation practice favours measurements both in syllables per second (syll/s) and phones per second (pho/s). Since the relationship between the two is not straightforward in languages with complex syllabic structures (Pfitzinger, 1998;Koreman, 2006), we will report both rate units.…”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fletcher 2010), megkülönböztetésük azért lehet iránymutató, mert egészen más eredményekhez vezethetnek. Hozzá kell tennünk, hogy mindkét típus vizsgálható akusztikai mérésekkel és percepciós tesztekkel egyaránt (Pfitzinger 1996, Wagner-Windmann 2011, Gibbon et al 2014), de itt most csak az előbbire koncentrálunk. Kimutatták, hogy az időbeli mintázatok eltérőek lehetnek attól függően, hogy mekkora alapegységet vizsgálunk (lásd de Looze 2010).…”
Section: Tempóingadozások a Beszédbenunclassified