2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-012-0181-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Sensemaking of Policy Paradoxes – Implementing Local Crime Prevention in Sweden

Abstract: This paper analyses the policy implementation of local crime prevention and community safety programmes in Sweden. It focuses on the clash between the transnational idea-complex and the national context, i.e. the unavoidable policy paradoxes of a transnational idea diffusion, and how they are made sense of when handled at local level. In particular, it emphasizes how actors in socioeconomically different local contexts within the same urban area have partly different reasons and motives for implementation. By … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sense‐making phenomena have been evident in some public policy research. Examples include studies of rural planning (Hulme, ), discourse of “globalization” (Fiss & Hirsch, ), policy influence (Weible et al, ), local crime prevention (Persson, ), and emergency management systems (Lu & Xue, ). However, studies explicitly employing a sense‐making perspective to explain policy processes are non‐existent.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sense‐making phenomena have been evident in some public policy research. Examples include studies of rural planning (Hulme, ), discourse of “globalization” (Fiss & Hirsch, ), policy influence (Weible et al, ), local crime prevention (Persson, ), and emergency management systems (Lu & Xue, ). However, studies explicitly employing a sense‐making perspective to explain policy processes are non‐existent.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The politicization of crime-related fear was spurred by the fact that fear of crime and recorded exposure to crime did not correlate; hence, the presumption that fear of crime is in part a separate phenomenon, with separate causes. Though separate, they are connected in a common storyline that has fostered policy in a wide range of countries (Gilling 2001;Crawford 2009;Lidskog and Persson 2012;Persson 2013;Garland 2001), though with divergent institutional expressions in different countries and localities (see e.g. Edwards and Hughes 2005a;Crawford 2009;Gilling et al 2013).…”
Section: Aiming For a Changed Understanding Of (Feelings Of) Unsafetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crawford 2009), including Sweden (Lidskog and Persson 2012;Persson 2013). However, policy development in different countries and localities is not uniform (Crawford 2009;Gilling et al 2013), nor should these core assumptions be considered static.…”
Section: Aiming For a Changed Understanding Of (Feelings Of) Unsafetymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Still, numerous public surveys have measured feelings of unsafety as fear of specific crimes or fear of being out late at night (Björkemarken, 2009), and many local authorities in Sweden have adopted this general measure as a performance indicator. In the policy debate feelings of unsafety are not primarily associated with rising crime rates, but with general anxieties in society, anxieties which are generally argued to be unfounded and fed by the media (Persson, 2012). However, feelings of unsafety, as a political concept, is positioned within the policy field of community safety and local crime prevention.…”
Section: A Developed Conceptualization Of Feelings Of Unsafetymentioning
confidence: 99%