2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00209-009-0531-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local rigidity of quasi-regular varieties

Abstract: For a G-variety X with an open orbit, we define its boundary ∂X as the complement of the open orbit. The action sheaf S X is the subsheaf of the tangent sheaf made of vector fields tangent to ∂X. We prove, for a large family of smooth spherical varieties, the vanishing of the cohomology groups H i (X, S X ) for i > 0, extending results of F. Bien and M. Brion [BB96]. We apply these results to study the local rigidity of the smooth projective varieties with Picard number one classified in [Pa08b].

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We refer to [30], [31] or [19] for more details on the geometry of these varieties and on the geometry of smooth Fano horospherical varieties of Picard rank one.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer to [30], [31] or [19] for more details on the geometry of these varieties and on the geometry of smooth Fano horospherical varieties of Picard rank one.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If now X t is a contact manifold for t = 0, when is X 0 still a contact manifold? If b 2 (X t ) = 1, there is a counterexample due to [PP10], see also [Hw10].…”
Section: Deformations I: the Rational Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are two orbit varieties, an open orbit and a closed orbit, under the action of their automorphism groups which are non-reductive. See Theorem 2.10 for the precise statements and notation following [PP10]. We also write down some known interesting geometry of these nonhomogeneous horospherical manifolds in Subsection 2.3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%