2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local recurrence rates after radiofrequency ablation or resection of colorectal liver metastases. Analysis of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer #40004 and #40983

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
102
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
102
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…our results are also supported by the results of a recently published study (29) that reports local tumor recurrence after RFA and surgical resection in two independent European organisation for Research and treatment of Cancer (EoRtC) studies. In that study, local recurrence rate per lesion after RFA or surgery was not significantly different in lesions up to 3 cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…our results are also supported by the results of a recently published study (29) that reports local tumor recurrence after RFA and surgical resection in two independent European organisation for Research and treatment of Cancer (EoRtC) studies. In that study, local recurrence rate per lesion after RFA or surgery was not significantly different in lesions up to 3 cm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Data on oligometastases of lung cancer have frequently been reported [21,22,23]. Oligometastatic prostate cancer and oligometastatic liver disease in colorectal cancer are also often discussed [5,24,25,26]. So far, malignant melanoma and malignancies of the cervix and breast are reported less frequently in the context of oligometastasis [27,28,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size of the initial lesion has also been shown to be a predictive factor for local tumor progression, with lesions >3 cm in size having recurrence rates up to seven times higher than those <3 cm in size (18). Although this may be a factor in some cases, other biological factors should still be considered, rather than simply an arbitrary size cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%