2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local recurrence following breast-conserving treatment in women aged 40years or younger: Trends in risk and the impact on prognosis in a population-based cohort of 1143 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
63
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This was associated with a reduced risk of local and distant recurrences and death. Multiple studies have shown that improved locoregional control was associated with increased adjuvant systemic therapy [10,11,23,24], although it may also be due to improved patient selection and local treatment [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was associated with a reduced risk of local and distant recurrences and death. Multiple studies have shown that improved locoregional control was associated with increased adjuvant systemic therapy [10,11,23,24], although it may also be due to improved patient selection and local treatment [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have demonstrated that patients with late IBTR have a better prognosis than those with early IBTR [3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. However, distant recurrence after late IBTR is not rare.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these studies, the time interval from initial surgery to IBTR (disease-free interval) was one of the most important predictors of disease recurrence after IBTR [3,4,5,6,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16]. Patients with IBTR >5 years after breast-conserving surgery have a better prognosis than patients with earlier IBTR [8,13,15,16]. However, it is not rare for patients with IBTR >5 years after initial surgery to develop systemic recurrence [6,13,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This question has been addressed in several studies attempting to differentiate between true recurrences and new primaries [25,26,27,28], from which the following conclusions can be derived: The majority of IBTRs are true recurrences, which tend to occur earlier and in the same quadrant as the initial tumor, metastasize earlier and more often and result in a shorter OS and disease-free survival (DFS) than new primaries. Further retrospective studies [29,30,31] evaluating IBTRs showed that there are subgroups of patients with improved rates of OS, DFS, and second local recurrence. Based on these retrospective studies, selection criteria for patients who may be candidates for a second breast-conserving approach are summarized in table 1.…”
Section: Therapy Of Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrencementioning
confidence: 99%