2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-006-9310-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local recurrence after mastectomy for breast cancer: analysis of clinicopathological, biological and prognostic characteristics

Abstract: Based on classical clinicopathological factors as well as on some new biological parameters we have been able to identify subgroups of mastectomized patients with LR differing in their prognosis. Thus, at the present time it would be possible to select group of patients candidates for further and individualized therapeutic strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
22
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Correno did not observe any statistically significant association between AR expression and local recurrences [35], which, however, has not been confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Correno did not observe any statistically significant association between AR expression and local recurrences [35], which, however, has not been confirmed in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Recurrence appeared to be stage-dependent and independent of the use of IBR. In addition, this wide range is possibly due to potential bias because of inadequate axillary sampling, incomplete surgical technique, and suboptimal systemic therapy [56]. A recent pooled analysis by Jatoi and Proschan of six randomized trials comparing mastectomy and breast conservation in the treatment of primary breast cancer examined mortality and LR [57].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carreno et al [33] did not find any prognostic value for IHC-AR N with regard to local recurrence using a single TMA core from 25 patients. This is in agreement with our observations, which showed no prognostic information regarding RFS (Table II).…”
Section: Journal Of Surgical Oncologymentioning
confidence: 92%