2024
DOI: 10.1039/d3cs00669g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local reaction environment in electrocatalysis

Chaojie Chen,
Huanyu Jin,
Pengtang Wang
et al.

Abstract: This review summarizes and analyses the development of local environment modification in promoting e-refinery. The surface structure, interfacial electric field and ion distribution collectively determine the electrolyte–electrode interface.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 296 publications
(348 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the Gouy–Chapman–Stern electric double layer model, the microenvironment modulation can be categorized into three scales: catalytic surface, Stern layer, and diffusion layer. 141,142 For catalytic surface microenvironment modulation, theoretical computation revealed that the reductive elimination of bridging O atoms on the surface of SnO 2 was thermodynamically energetic at −0.8 V, whereas the free energy of removing bridging OH groups from the surface surpassed 0 eV at specific steps. 143 The thermodynamic energetic barriers to the reductive elimination of OH groups contributed to the theoretical basis for Sn + retention, and its experimental validation was implemented through synthesizing SnO 2 with enriched surface OH groups (Fig.…”
Section: Oxidation-state Stabilization Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the Gouy–Chapman–Stern electric double layer model, the microenvironment modulation can be categorized into three scales: catalytic surface, Stern layer, and diffusion layer. 141,142 For catalytic surface microenvironment modulation, theoretical computation revealed that the reductive elimination of bridging O atoms on the surface of SnO 2 was thermodynamically energetic at −0.8 V, whereas the free energy of removing bridging OH groups from the surface surpassed 0 eV at specific steps. 143 The thermodynamic energetic barriers to the reductive elimination of OH groups contributed to the theoretical basis for Sn + retention, and its experimental validation was implemented through synthesizing SnO 2 with enriched surface OH groups (Fig.…”
Section: Oxidation-state Stabilization Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…30 This could be attributed to the large overpotential and high concentration of local H + at the electrochemical interface, which unfortunately led to further reduction of H 2 O 2 to water at the active sites. 31,32 Therefore, there is an urgent need to modulate the electronic structure of the cobalt site to ensure high intrinsic ■ RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Computational Catalyst Screening. We first investigated the activity and selectivity of different catalytic centers toward two-electron ORR using DFT calculations.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al showed that pyrrole-type CoN 4 exhibited a relatively high H 2 O 2 yield (2032 mg in 90 h), but the overall H 2 O 2 selectivity is less than 80% . This could be attributed to the large overpotential and high concentration of local H + at the electrochemical interface, which unfortunately led to further reduction of H 2 O 2 to water at the active sites. , Therefore, there is an urgent need to modulate the electronic structure of the cobalt site to ensure high intrinsic activity for H 2 O 2 generation in acid while inhibiting H 2 O 2 further reduction to water under practical operating conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the sluggish kinetics of the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) at the anode side result in increased energy consumption, posing a significant obstacle to its widespread implementation [2][3][4][5]. Therefore, the search for electrocatalysts with excellent OER performance to meet the needs of the future is one of the fundamental driving forces in the materials science community [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%