2007
DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2007.30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local polarization of tightly focused unpolarized light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
54
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical fields can thereby be classified into one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), or three-dimensional (3D) light, depending on the minimum number of orthogonal coordinate axes required to represent them. The dimensional nature of light plays an essential role in addressing polarization characteristics of complex-structured light fields, e.g., electromagnetic near and surface fields [3][4][5] as well as tightly focused optical beams [6][7][8][9], which are frequently exploited in near-field probing [10], singlemolecule detection [11], particle trapping [12], among other polarization-sensitive applications. Yet, no systematic theory has so far been developed which provides rigorous means to categorize and to characterize the dimensionality of light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical fields can thereby be classified into one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional (2D), or three-dimensional (3D) light, depending on the minimum number of orthogonal coordinate axes required to represent them. The dimensional nature of light plays an essential role in addressing polarization characteristics of complex-structured light fields, e.g., electromagnetic near and surface fields [3][4][5] as well as tightly focused optical beams [6][7][8][9], which are frequently exploited in near-field probing [10], singlemolecule detection [11], particle trapping [12], among other polarization-sensitive applications. Yet, no systematic theory has so far been developed which provides rigorous means to categorize and to characterize the dimensionality of light.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have presented results at the focal plane (u = 0) of an air aplanatic lens with NA = 0.9. Results were evaluated for homogeneously polarized [30] and completely unpolarized [31] cases of nonvortex beam compared, and good agreement is found between both.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A fair amount of literature is available on the coherence matrix to deal with such situation. Modification has also been made in the coherence matrix to take consideration of the vectorial nature and 2 International Journal of Optics 3D characteristics of the tightly focused beam [29][30][31]. Detailed study on the tight focusing of uniformly partially polarized radiation has been carried out in the past [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obtaining these specific features involves the suitable design of the input field [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Research on the polarization properties of highly focused fields has been mainly devoted on fully polarized light, whereas partially polarized waves have received less attention [7][8][9]. Moreover, the use of partially coherent fields has been recently proposed as a suitable light source for optical trapping systems [10]; this kind of fields are also useful in tomography [11], plasmonics spectroscopy [12], or invisibility cloaking [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate the behavior of this kind of beams, the 3D-degree of polarization P 3D and the profile of the transversal (I t W 11 W 22 ), longitudinal (I z W 33 ), and total (I T I t I r ) irradiances are calculated as a function of r. Although several measures for the 3D-degree of polarization have been proposed (see, for instance, [20] and references therein), in what follows the P 3D is calculated according to Eq. (32) [3,8] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%