Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: Lessons from Sweden

Stenseke, Marie

doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.005

Cited by 135 publications

(145 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

128

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Attitudes towards a project (Banville et al, 1998), Potential conflicts and coalitions between stakeholders and objectives (Fottler et al, 1989;Elliot and Schlaepfer, 2001), Interest in the project (FAO, 2000;Varvasovszky and Brugha, 2000), Access to resources (Luyet, 2005;Crozier and Friedberg, 1977), Political influence over the project (Laumann and Knocke, 1987), Degree of implication (Luyet, 2005), Power, stakeholder urgency, proximity and legitimacy (Mitchell et al, 1997;Stenseke, 2009;Habermas, 1984), and Scale of influence (Rist et al, 2007).…”

Section: Stakeholder Characterizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, it must be stressed that simply copying the best examples of public participation will not guarantee success in other case studies. Cultural, political and historical contexts should also be taken into account (Stenseke, 2009;Abelson et al, 2007HarmoniCOP, 2005Sabatier et al, 2005;Irvin and Stansbury, 2004;Vroom, 2003;Sobel et al, 2001). Another example is the practice to focus on only specific, limited aspects of the process (Reed, 2008;Abelson et al, 2007;Buchy and Hoverman, 2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects

Luyet

Schlaepfer

Parlange

et al. 2012

Journal of Environmental Management

347

258

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b s t r a c tParticipation has emerged as an appropriate approach for enhancing natural resources management. However, despite long experimentation with participation, there are still possibilities for improvement in designing a process of stakeholder involvement by addressing stakeholder heterogeneity and the complexity of decision-making processes.This paper provides a state-of-the-art overview of methods. It proposes a comprehensive framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects, from stakeholder identification to evaluation. For each process within this framework, techniques are reviewed and practical tools proposed. The aim of this paper is to establish methods to determine who should participate, when and how. The application of this framework to one river restoration case study in Switzerland will illustrate its strengths and weaknesses.

show abstract

Section: Stakeholder Characterizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects

Luyet

Schlaepfer

Parlange

et al. 2012

Journal of Environmental Management

347

258

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Figure 3 reveals the potential key stakeholders in the NOGI. The inclusion of these stakeholder groups is because of their evident to interest and the attributes they possess (Stenseke, 2009). However, the community will be assessed in more detail in this paper in order to identify and analyse the various sub-groups of secondary stakeholders.…”

Section: Potential Key Stakeholders In the Nogimentioning

confidence: 99%

Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities

Osobajo¹,

Moore²

2017

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Nigerian oil and gas industry (NOGI) has over time been dominated by the Nigerian government and oil producing companies (OPCs). The influences of the community stakeholder on OPCs in the last three decades have been expressed in diverse ways by different community sub-groups through their concerns and interests, some of which have severely impacted on the NOGI. Community within this context is categorised as a primary stakeholder, while the sub-groups are secondary stakeholders that emerge from within the community. Hence, the success of the NOGI largely depends on the Nigerian government and the oil producing companies, and other players such as Non-Governmental Organisations recognising the community as a key player and having appropriate knowledge of the different sub-groups of secondary stakeholders within the community in order to understand their intentions, behaviour, interests, influences and interrelations. Such knowledge is relevant to the NOGI's formulation of future oil and gas strategy.This study commences with an overview of the primary stakeholders (i.e. the Nigerian government, OPC and the community), their respective activities, participation and the link between these stakeholders with a specific focus on the NOGI context. Subsequently, various sub-groups of secondary stakeholders within the community and their respective interest(s) are identified in detail.

show abstract

“…Such a site should represent an Outstanding Universal Value from a historical, aesthetic, ethnological, or anthropological point of view. According to Stenseke (2009), for a cultural landscape nomination to become a UNESCO World Heritage Site, enhancing knowledge about the prerequisites for local participation in the planning and management of landscapes, and revealing critical aspects are priorities (Blandford, 2006).…”

Section: The Study Areamentioning

confidence: 99%

Planning Rural Landscapes: A Participatory Approach to Analyse Future Scenarios in Monferrato Astigiano, Piedmont, Italy

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The future of rural landscapes in Europe is a subject of considerable debate between policy makers and researchers. This paper aims to analyse public awareness of social, economic, and political forces affecting future rural landscapes in an effort to support local planning policies implementing the European Landscape Convention in a rural landscape (Piedmont, Italy). Public consultation with two focus groups (Institutional Stakeholders and Civil Society Stakeholders) was set up to reveal personal perceptions. In a first part the main driving forces affecting local landscape transformations were identified and their likely effects were discussed with the participants.Participants' preferences regarding three alternative future scenarios were analysed in a second part.Results confirmed the complexity of a shared decision-making process in planning rural landscapes.Not only did the two groups differ in expectation, perception, and attitude, but also in their interpretation of the landscape scenarios.

show abstract

Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: Lessons from Sweden

Cited by 135 publications

References 21 publications

A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects

A framework to implement Stakeholder participation in environmental projects

Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities

Planning Rural Landscapes: A Participatory Approach to Analyse Future Scenarios in Monferrato Astigiano, Piedmont, Italy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About